Showing posts with label taxpayer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label taxpayer. Show all posts

Friday, September 17, 2010

Taxpayers Will See Relief By Way of Inflation-Adjusted Indexing, But Total Tax Impact Remains Unclear, CCH Says

/PRNewswire/ -- Taxpayers stuck in the current economic downturn will get at least some relief in 2011 thanks to the mandatory upward inflation-adjustments called for under the tax code, according to CCH, which today released estimated income ranges for each 2011 tax bracket. CCH also projects the growing number of other inflation-sensitive tax figures, such as the personal exemption and the standard deduction.

"Indexing for inflation has become an established part of our tax system, and it's likely to be a part of the tax law for the foreseeable future even as Congress debates changes to the tax rates themselves," according to George Jones, JD, CCH Senior Federal Tax Analyst.

Projections this year, however, are clouded by the uncertainty of expiring provisions in the tax code. If Congress allows the tax cuts within Economic Growth and Tax Relief and Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) to expire as called for at the end of 2010, many taxpayers could lose more ground than they will otherwise gain.

When there is inflation, indexing of brackets lowers tax bills by including more of people's incomes in lower brackets - in the existing 15-percent rather than the existing 25-percent bracket, for example. The formula used in indexing showed a relatively small amount of inflation this year, just under 1.5 percent. However, this is far greater in comparison to the 0.18 percent inflation factor used to set 2010 tax amounts. Therefore, while 2010 inflation-adjusted amounts in many cases stayed flat as a result, most 2011 figures will move higher.

For 2011, however, the big question is not whether the brackets will continue to increase because of inflation - they will. Rather, it is what tax rates will be applied against those brackets. The current 10-, 15-, 25-, 33- and 35-percent rates are now scheduled to sunset to the pre-EGTRRA rate structure of 15, 28, 31, 36 and 39.6 percent. In addition, there are two possible alternative scenarios being debated by lawmakers:

-- Extend the current tax bracket structure in its entirety; or
-- As the proposal from President Obama calls for, keep the current rate
structure except revive the 36- and 39.6-percent rates, starting at a
higher income bracket level; he would also amend the standard
deduction so that it does not revive the marriage penalty that had
been in place prior to EGTRRA.



In other words, Jones noted, it gets complicated quickly without knowing yet which approach Congress will take.

"While we were looking at the very real possibility of deflation in the tax adjustment required under the tax code last year, this year we are 'back to normal' in the sense that the expected upward adjustment in tax benefits from 2010-2011 are taking place," said Jones. "The only wildcard remains how Congress will deal with the sunsetting provisions. We may not know that until a possible lame-duck session of Congress this December."

The examples below show the modest tax savings generated by indexing and how they would be reversed if the EGTRRA tax cuts were to expire wholesale:

-- Because of inflation adjustments, a married couple filing jointly with
a total taxable income of $100,000 should pay $112.50 less in income
taxes in 2011 than they will on the same income for 2010 (compared to
only a $12.50 savings between 2009 and 2010). That savings remains
whether the EGTRRA tax cuts are fully extended or President Obama's
proposal is adopted. However, if the rates and marriage penalty relief
sunset entirely, the couple will end up paying $3,143 more in taxes in
2011.
-- A single filer with taxable income of $50,000 should owe $56 less next
year due to the adjustments (again, compared to only a $6.25 savings
between 2009 and 2010). However, once again, even with savings from
the inflation adjustments, a single filer will owe $834 more in 2011
than in 2010 on the same $50,000 amount if complete sunset of the
rates takes place.
-- For taxpayers with more than $379,150 in taxable income in both 2010
and 2011, the maximum savings from indexing the tax brackets for 2011
will be more dramatic. However, so will the additional tax that would
be owed under either a complete sunset of the EGTRRA tax cuts or
adoption of the Obama proposal, which would continue to give
high-income taxpayers the incremental benefit of the 10-percent rate
bracket as well as allow them an expanded 28-percent bracket.
Inflation-generated savings if all rates were extended would amount to
$330 for a single filer with $400,000 taxable income, for example.
However, that same taxpayer would pay an additional $11,394 under a
full sunset of the rates, and $5,080 more under the Obama proposal
above 2010 amounts.


Inflation Adjustments


Since the late 1980s, the U.S. tax code has required that federal income tax brackets be adjusted for inflation annually, and inflation adjustments have been inserted into the Internal Revenue Code in recent years with increasing frequency.

For example, the Code now requires over 50 other inflation-driven computations to determine deduction, exemption and exclusion amounts in addition to the 40 separate computations needed to inflation-adjust the tax bracket tables each year. In fact, the health care reform legislation passed earlier this year adds an even greater number of inflation-adjustments to the tax code, although health-related indexing won't start until 2013.

Most adjustments are based on Consumer Price Index figures for September through August immediately prior to the adjusted year. However, some inflation-adjusted figures are computed earlier and some later. For example, amounts such as the 2011 vehicle depreciation limits won't be available until 2011 (the $3,060 regular first-year amount for 2010 was not released until February 2010), while the standard business mileage rate (that is currently set at 50 cents for 2010) isn't expected to be computed for 2011 and released until December 2010.

CCH's projections for other indexed amounts are based on the relevant inflation data released September 17, 2010, by the U.S. Department of Labor.

The IRS usually releases official numbers by December each year. CCH tax bracket projections are provided for illustrative purposes only, and should not be used for income tax returns or other federal income tax related purposes until confirmed by the IRS later this year.

Some Items Not Indexed

Jones observed that some items in the Code are not indexed for inflation and stay the same, while others rise by dollar amounts already written into the tax law.

"The exemption amounts for the alternative minimum tax are not indexed, which means that each year Congress must either increase the amounts by statute or expose additional households to the AMT," Jones said.

For 2009, Congress set the AMT exemption amounts at $46,700 for single individuals and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly. Congress has relied on one- or two-year AMT patches to account for inflation from the initially set amounts of $33,750 and $45,000, respectively. However, there is no technical requirement under the tax code to increase those amounts for inflation. No amounts have been set yet for 2010, no less for 2011. While they are scheduled to revert to the default amounts of $33,750/$45,000 without action, the Obama administration tax proposals contemplate further increases.

Standard Deduction, Personal Exemption Rise

The standard deduction and personal exemption amounts are also subject to indexing; however, because of "rounding down," some years show no change at all. After very little movement in the 2010 amounts, 2011 will see a jump in all standard deduction levels. However, a wrinkle occurs if the EGTRRA sunset provisions move forward. In which case, the marriage penalty relief that has been built into the standard deduction for married couples filing jointly will be eliminated. Rather than double the standard deduction for unmarried single filers, the 2011 standard deduction for joint filers would drop by $1,750 to $9,650, even taking the past year's inflation into account.

Assuming that Congress will not let any of the standard deduction amounts sunset, however, the standard deduction for single taxpayers, heads of households and marrieds filing separately will all increase by $100 in 2011. The standard deduction for joint filers would rise by $200, to $11,600. Any increase in the standard deduction, of course, can produce lower taxes by decreasing the taxpayer's taxable income.

The additional standard deduction for those age 65 or older or who are blind will rise by $50 to $1,150 in 2011 for married individuals and surviving spouses, and by $50 to $1,450 for single filers. The personal exemption amount also gets bumped up by inflation by $50, to $3,700 in 2011.

Taxpayers have had to lose a good portion of the value of personal exemptions and itemized deductions when their incomes rise above certain levels, which have also been adjusted for inflation. For 2010, these "phaseouts" disappeared from the tax code, but only temporarily if Congress does not act. As part of the EGTRRA sunset, they are scheduled to return in 2011, with a personal exemption phase-out range starting at $254,350 for joint filers and $169,550 for single filers and a phase-out range for itemized deductions starting at $169,550 for all filers except married couples filing separately whose phase-out range for itemized deductions starts at $84,775.

"The removal of limitations on itemized deductions and personal exemptions, rather than indexing of brackets, will provide major tax savings in 2010 for many well-off taxpayers. The return of these limitations in 2011 would pose an equally important change in the reverse direction," Jones observed.

For a complete look at how income ranges for each tax bracket are projected to shift next, see the CCH chart below.

"Kiddie" Deduction, Gift Tax Exemption

In general, inflation adjustments are rounded to the next-lower multiple of $50, so if the adjustment produces an increase of less than $50, no increase is made. The "kiddie" deduction, used on the returns of children claimed as dependents on their parents' returns, increased only five times in the years 2001 through 2010. It last rose for the 2009 tax year. For 2011 the deduction will remain at that $950 level.

The Code only allows the gift tax exemption to rise when the inflation adjustment would produce an increase of $1,000 or more. The last increase occurred in 2009, when it rose to $13,000. It remains there for 2011.

CCH 2011 TAX PROJECTIONS*




  Married Filing Jointly (& Surviving Spouse)

    Tax
   Rate   2011 Taxable Income
                 Complete              Full
                  Sunset            Extension
     10%  n/a                         $0-$17,000
     15%           $0-$57,650    $17,000-$69,000
     25%  n/a                    $69,000-139,350
     28%     $57,650-$139,350  $139,350-$212,300
     31%    $139,350-$212,300  n/a
     33%  n/a                  $212,300-$379,150
     35%  n/a                           $379,150+
     36%    $212,300-$379,150  n/a
   39.6%             $379,150+ n/a





    Tax                                            2010 Taxable
   Rate            2011 Taxable Income                 Income
                          Obama
                         Proposal
     10%                            $0-$17,000         $0-$16,750
     15%                            $0-$69,000    $16,750-$68,000
     25%                      $69,000-$139,350   $68,000-$137,300
     28%                     $139,350-$237,300  $137,300-$209,250
     31%  n/a                                   n/a
     33%  n/a                                   $209,250-$373,650
     35%  n/a                                            $373,650+
     36%                     $237,300-$379,150  n/a
   39.6%                              $379,150+ n/a





  Unmarried Individuals (other than surviving spouses and heads of
  households)

  Tax Rate  2011 Taxable Income
              Complete Sunset     Full Extension
      10%   n/a                          $0-$8,500
      15%            $0-$34,500     $8,500-$34,500
      25%   n/a                    $34,500-$83,600
      28%       $34,500-$83,600   $83,600-$174,400
      31%      $83,600-$174,400  n/a
      33%   n/a                  $174,400-$379,150
      35%   n/a                           $379,150+
      36%     $174,400-$379,150  n/a
     39.6%             $379,150+ n/a





                                                     2010 Taxable
  Tax Rate     2011 Taxable Income                      Income
                 Obama Proposal
      10%                              $0-$8,500          $0-$8,375
      15%                         $8,500-$34,500     $8,375-$34,000
      25%                        $34,500-$83,600    $34,000-$82,400
      28%                       $83,600-$195,550   $82,400-$171,850
      31%  n/a                                    n/a
      33%  n/a                                    $171,850-$373,650
      35%  n/a                                             $373,650+
      36%                      $195,550-$379,150  n/a
     39.6%                              $379,150+ n/a





  Head of Household

  Tax Rate  2011 Taxable Income
              Complete Sunset     Full Extension
      10%   n/a                         $0-$12,150
      15%            $0-$46,250    $12,150-$46,250
      25%   n/a                   $46,250-$119,400
      28%      $46,250-$119,400  $119,400-$193,350
      31%     $119,400-$193,350  n/a
      33%   n/a                  $193,350-$379,150
      35%   n/a                           $379,150+
      36%     $193,350-$379,150  n/a
     39.6%             $379,150+ n/a





                                                     2010 Taxable
  Tax Rate     2011 Taxable Income                      Income
                 Obama Proposal
      10%                             $0-$12,150         $0-$11,950
      15%                        $12,150-$46,250    $11,950-$45,550
      25%                       $46,250-$119,400   $45,550-$117,650
      28%                      $119,400-$216,400  $117,650-$190,550
      31%  n/a                                    n/a
      33%  n/a                                    $190,550-$373,650
      35%  n/a                                             $373,650+
      36%                      $216,400-$379,150  n/a
     39.6%                              $379,150+ n/a





  Married Individuals Filing Separate Returns

  Tax Rate  2011 Taxable Income
              Complete Sunset     Full Extension
      10%   n/a                          $0-$8,500
      15%            $0-$28,825     $8,500-$34,500
      25%   n/a                    $34,500-$69,675
      28%       $28,825-$69,675   $69,675-$106,150
      31%      $69,675-$106,150  n/a
      33%   n/a                  $106,150-$189,575
      35%   n/a                           $189,575+
      36%     $106,150-$189,575  n/a
     39.6%             $189,575+ n/a





                                                     2010 Taxable
  Tax Rate     2011 Taxable Income                      Income
                 Obama Proposal
      10%                              $0-$8,500          $0-$8,375
      15%                         $8,500-$34,500     $8,375-$34,000
      25%                        $34,500-$69,675    $34,000-$68,650
      28%                        $69,675-118,650   $68,650-$104,625
      31%  n/a                                    n/a
      33%  n/a                                    $104,625-$186,825
      35%  n/a                                             $186,825+
      36%                      $118,650-$189,575  n/a
     39.6%                              $189,575+ n/a





  Standard Deduction Amounts

  Filing Status    2011**                        2010   Increase
  Married Filing
   Jointly (&
   Surviving
   Spouse)             $9,650 (with marriage  $11,400   (-$1,750)
                    penalty relief
                    sunset);
                   $11,600 (without marriage
                    penalty relief
                    sunset)                   $11,400        $200
  Married Filing
   Separately          $4,825 (with marriage   $5,700     (-$875)
                    penalty relief
                    sunset)
                    $5,800 (without marriage
                    penalty relief
                    sunset                     $5,700        $100
  Single                              $5,800   $5,700        $100
  Head of
   Household                          $8,500   $8,400        $100

  **A marriage penalty exists when the combined tax liability of a
  couple filing a joint return is greater than the sum of the tax
  liabilities each would have if they were unmarried. If the EGTRRA
  sunset takes effect, it will trigger a marriage penalty with the
  basic standard deduction for married individuals filing joint
  returns dropping considerably.





  Standard Deduction for Dependents ("Kiddie" Standard Deduction)

        2011                   2010     Increase
             $950              $950              $0





  Income Level at Which 3-Percent Itemized Deduction Limitation Takes
  Effect (Adjusted Gross Income)

                      2011(with
  Filing Status        sunset)    2010***        2009
  Married Filing
   Jointly             $169,550  n/a         $166,800
  (& Surviving
   Spouse)
  Married Filing
   Separately           $84,775  n/a          $83,400
  Single               $169,550  n/a         $166,800
  Head of Household    $169,550  n/a         $166,800

  *** For 2010, these limitations disappeared from the tax code; if the
  limitation rules under EGTRRA are allowed to sunset, the above rates
  will apply for 2011.





  Personal Exemption Amounts

   2011     2010  Increase
  $3,700  $3,650       $50





  Threshold for Personal Exemption Phaseout

                    2011(with
  Filing Status       sunset)    2010****      2009
  Married Filing
   Jointly            $254,350  n/a        $250,200
  (& Surviving
   Spouse)
  Married Filing
   Separately         $127,175  n/a        $125,100
  Single              $169,550  n/a        $166,800
  Head of
   Household          $211,950  n/a        $208,500

  **** For 2010, these "phaseouts" disappeared from the tax code; if
  the phaseout rules under EGTRRA are allowed to sunset, the above
  phaseout levels will apply for 2011.





  Gift Tax Exemption

    2011      2010   Increase
  $13,000  $13,000         $0





  Income Limit for Full Roth IRA Contribution

  Filing Status      2011      2010   Increase
  Married
   Filing
   Jointly       $169,000  $167,000     $2,000
  Single         $107,000  $105,000     $2,000

  Income Limit for Full Roth IRA Contribution
  Filing Status               2011      2010  Increase
  Married Filing Jointly  $169,000  $167,000    $2,000
  Single                  $107,000  $105,000    $2,000


* These numbers are projected for the 2011 tax year and have not been confirmed by the Internal Revenue Service.
CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business (CCHGroup.com) is the leading global provider of tax, accounting and audit information, software and services. It has served tax, accounting and business professionals since 1913.

-----
Community News You Can Use
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

New Tax Law Changes Can Help Millions of Taxpayers Save Money

/PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- As we near the final days of 2008, what continues to weigh heavy on the minds of many people is the slowing U.S. economy -- unemployment has reached the highest percentage in years at 6.7 percent*, layoffs and business closures continue and the housing market remains weak. This year, lawmakers have passed more than a hundred new tax law changes intended to help millions of individual taxpayers. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service(R) encourages taxpayers to find out how these new tax credits and deductions can help lower their individual tax liability and possibly put more money back in their pockets this tax season.

"With more than a hundred pro-taxpayer credits and deductions, many taxpayers will qualify for new benefits that may not have been available last year," said Mark Steber, vice president of tax resources at Jackson Hewitt Tax Service. "Taxpayers affected by these changes could see significant savings, and with the current recession, it is even more important that taxpayers get all of the tax benefits they deserve."

Tax Law Changes
Steber outlines some money-saving tax law changes for 2008, including:

-- Economic Stimulus Payment and Recovery Rebate Credit: This initiative
is a two-phased program consisting of the economic stimulus payment
and the recovery rebate credit. Phase one was the economic stimulus
payment which was an advanced payment of the projected amount of
recovery rebate credit available on the taxpayer's 2008 return. Phase
two is the 2008 component of the program, so taxpayers who did not
receive their full economic stimulus payment in 2008 may qualify for
the remainder as a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2008 tax returns.
For example, Jane, a single taxpayer, filed her 2007 tax return in
February 2008. She filed single, without children, and received a
$600 economic stimulus payment. In November, Jane gave birth to a
baby girl. Because she had a child in 2008, Jane may be eligible for
an additional $300 credit when she files her 2008 tax return and
claims her child as a dependent.

-- Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act: Homeowners who experienced
foreclosure on their primary home can exclude the cancelled debt
amount from their taxable income. For example, a married couple
filing jointly with an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $35,000, and a
home foreclosure that includes $10,000 in cancelled debt, could
decrease their tax liability by $1,500 under this act. In the past,
the $10,000 of cancelled debt would have been considered taxable
income to the individual that owed the debt. The home must meet the
following criteria:
-- It must be the taxpayer's main residence
-- The amount of debt forgiven cannot exceed $2,000,000
-- The loan must have been used to buy, build or substantially
improve the home.

-- Housing Assistance Tax Act: Taxpayers who pay real estate taxes and
are not otherwise eligible to itemize deductions can increase their
standard deduction amount by the lesser of:
-- Real estate taxes paid in 2008 OR
-- $500 ($1,000 if married filing jointly)


For example, a married couple filing jointly with an income of $28,000 that did not itemize their tax return but paid $1,200 in real estate taxes in 2008 could increase their standard deduction amount by $1,000. This additional standard deduction would decrease their tax liability by $100.

-- Additional Child Tax Credit: The Additional Child Tax Credit is a
refundable credit. This year, the income threshold has been decreased
to $8,500 from $12,050, allowing certain taxpayers to qualify for up
to $533 more per child in a potential refund. For example, a single
parent with two children and an income of $15,000 would receive a
refund of $5,799. Before the change, the potential refund amount
would have been $5,266.

-- First Time Homebuyers Credit: Taxpayers who purchased a new home for
the first time after April 8, 2008, may qualify for a refundable
credit up to $7,500. Part of the American Housing Rescue and
Foreclosure Prevention Act, this refundable tax credit works like an
interest-free loan for all qualified taxpayers. The credit must be
paid back in equal parts over a period of 15 years beginning in 2010.

Extending expired tax benefits
Lawmakers also extended several expired tax benefits, including:
-- Tax-free charitable donations for taxpayers 70.5 or older who choose
to direct up to a $100,000 donation from a traditional or Roth IRA
directly to a charitable organization.
-- A two-year extension of the Educator Expense Deduction which allows
teachers an above-the-line tax deduction of up to $250 for
out-of-pocket classroom expenses.
-- A two-year extension of the Qualified Tuition Deduction which allows
students to directly deduct up to $4,000 of qualified tuition and fees
paid to a college or trade school.
-- A two-year extension to the sales tax deduction. Taxpayers can claim
the greater of their state and local income taxes paid or their state
and local sales taxes paid when itemizing deductions. This is of
particular interest to taxpayers that live in states with little or no
income tax and those that purchased high-ticket items during the year.


"These are just some of the changes in the tax laws this year," added Steber. "Taxpayers should consult a trained tax preparer this year in particular, to ensure they don't miss out on the benefits available as a result of these new credits and deductions or any other commonly overlooked deductions. Clearly it is even more important this year that taxpayers ensure they get back the money they deserve or keep more money in their pockets."

Unemployed in 2008

For those taxpayers who were unemployed in 2008, it is important to remember that unemployment compensation is taxable on federal and most state tax returns. Income tax is not automatically withheld from unemployment compensation, however, individuals can elect to have taxes deducted. If you did not have taxes withheld throughout the year, you may have a potential balance due when you file your 2008 income taxes.

For those taxpayers looking for a job during 2008, there are deductible costs they can claim if they itemize deductions, including:

-- Mileage costs accrued on a personal vehicle while job hunting
including trips to job interviews and to the unemployment office.
Between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2008, taxpayers can claim 50.5
cents per mile. Between July 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008, taxpayers
can claim 58.5 cents per mile.
-- Costs for creating, printing and mailing a resume
-- Costs for a headhunter or job placement agency
-- Transportation costs such as a bus, taxi, train or plane to an
interview
-- Meals and lodging if out of town for an interview
-- Parking and tolls when driving to an interview
-- Long distance or mobile phone call charges directly associated with a
job search
-- Business research services
-- Physical exam expenses if required by a potential employer


If a taxpayer accepted a new job which required relocation, he or she may be able to deduct qualified moving expenses not reimbursed by the new employer. Taxpayers should keep receipts related to all moving expenses in order to substantiate these expenses.

For more information, including a list of the most commonly overlooked deductions, credits and updates on recent tax changes, visit www.jacksonhewitt.com.

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
Community News You Can Use
Fayetteville, Peachtree City, Tyrone
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Complete Analysis of the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 Available From the Tax & Accounting Business of Thomson Reuters

/PRNewswire/ -- Both the House and Senate unanimously and in record-time passed the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 at the end of last week, clearing the way for the President's signature. This new tax law, which is already available in full analysis on Checkpoint, the premier tax research platform for the Tax & Accounting business of Thomson Reuters, temporarily suspends the requirement for taxpayers age 70-1/2 and older (and their beneficiaries) to make annual minimum distributions from their retirement plan accounts. This will provide older Americans some much-needed financial flexibility as they struggle to manage their finances during this difficult economic time.

According to Bob Trinz, Senior Tax Analyst for the Tax & Accounting business of Thomson Reuters, tax laws generally require individuals with retirement accounts to make required withdrawals based on the size of their account and their age every year after age 70-1/2. The new law suspends the required minimum distribution from retirement accounts in 2009. This waiver, available to everyone regardless of their total retirement account balances, applies to all defined-contribution plans, including 401(k), 403(b), 457(b), and IRA accounts. Suspending the mandatory withdrawal allows retirees to keep the money in their account if they choose, and possibly recover some losses. The suspension for 2009 also applies to beneficiaries of retirement plan accounts and IRA owners.

The new law also provides relief for single-employer plans by allowing employers to "smooth" the value of pension plan assets over 24 months instead of having to apply the mathematical average that Treasury requires. This change will soften the accounting of 2008 plan losses. "The adjustment of this phase-in rule will provide great relief," says Trinz.

The new law also helps multiemployer plans, which may elect to "freeze" their status as (or as not) "endangered" or "critical" for one year. Plan years that started between October 1, 2008 and October 1, 2009 may elect to retain their status from the previous year. As before the new law, plans in endangered or critical status must adopt a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan, respectively. While a plan is in critical status, employers obligated to contribute must make additional contributions not required for plans in endangered status, but are relieved from the obligation to make general funding contributions. Under the new law, the election to freeze a plan's status would delay the need to respond to any lack of progress under the terms of the funding improvement or rehabilitation plan until the following plan year.

The new law also provides an election for sponsors of multiemployer plans in endangered or critical status in plan years beginning in 2008 or 2009, allowing a three-year extension of a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan. That allows these plans to accomplish their goals in 13 years instead of 10 (18 years instead of 15, for seriously endangered plans).

The new law makes numerous technical corrections to the Pension Protection Act of 2006. "The technical modification of greatest interest is for nonspouse beneficiaries of qualified plan participants and IRA owners," says Trinz. "For plan years beginning after 2009, company sponsored plans will have to offer nonspouse beneficiaries a rollover option. This gives much-needed flexibility to those who inherit retirement plan accounts from someone other than their spouse."

"The extent of the technicalities and scope of this new law is far-reaching and taxpayers should contact their tax preparers to ascertain how it will affect them in the long and short-term," says Trinz. "For our seniors, we can conclusively say: 'this will help.'"

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Bailout Mess Echoes S&L Crisis of the 1990's

Taxpayers may be howling about the price tag of the $700 billion bailout plan that Congress is considering, but according to Emory University economist Hashem Dezhbakhsh, the current crisis is reminiscent of another huge financial disaster in the not-so-distant past: the savings and loan bailout of the early 1990s.

"Savings and loans took a lot of risks in 1980s, which left a lot of institutions insolvent. Government had to come to rescue." The overall cost to taxpayers then? "Half a trillion," says Dezhbakhsh. "It is, in fact, déjà vu."

The cause of the current bailout is the same now as then, he says. "If you have a financial system with incentives that are not set properly, then the system lends itself to excessive risk taking at the expense of someone else."

The most unfortunate aspect of the current bail out effort is that it is so close to the election, says Dezhbakhsh. "That's why it's really hard to have a real debate about the plan. Both Democrats and Republicans are afraid that if noting were done, there would be a disaster, and they'd be responsible for it--even if they don't believe in bailing out institutions making bad choices."

One other unfortunate aspect is fear. "The public thinks this is subsidy for the rich and Wall Street," says Dezhbakhsh. "That's unfortunate because it shows total lack of trust in what politicians and Fed officials say. There is no doubt that special interests are at work here. One cannot deny that the treasury secretary (Henry M. Paulson Jr.) is a veteran of Wall Street.

"At the same time, no one can deny the psychological impact of a passive approach to the crisis that will be very dangerous," adds Dezhbakhsh. "If there is fear of banks collapsing, then there will be run on banks, you can have a severe credit crunch that spreads from the financial side to the rest of the economy. Then, no one can conduct business. That's the fear."

Dezhbakhsh, a professor of economics, is chair of Emory's Department of Economics. His areas of interest include applied econometrics, the oil market, financial markets and volatility, and economics of crime.

-----
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page

Monday, September 22, 2008

Duke: Treasury Action Should Work, But at High Cost to Taxpayers, Professor Says

The Treasury’s proposed action to use government money to purchase mortgage-backed securities held by financial institutions should work, but at an unnecessary cost to taxpayers, says Steven Schwarcz, the Stanley A. Star Professor of Law & Business at Duke University.

Schwarcz has studied systemic risk for more than a year and has suggested, in congressional testimony last October, that the government should consider acting as a market liquidity provider of last resort, but to do so at the outset of a financial market panic. His article, “Systemic Risk,” will be published next month in the Georgetown Law Journal.

“The focus from the outset should have been on treating loss of confidence in the financial markets, which is the underlying cause of problems in the financial system,” Schwarcz says. “While it may have been necessary under the circumstances for the Fed to act to prop up AIG and Bear Stearns, among others, preventing financial institution failure amounts to treating symptoms of the disease, not its underlying cause. By delaying, the government missed a vital opportunity to nip the problem in the bud at a much lower cost to the American taxpayer.”

The Treasury’s proposed bailout plan is a semi-strong version of Schwarcz’s proposal, which he said would work most effectively if used at the outset of a market panic. The current panic has become so entrenched, however, that financial institutions now distrust the creditworthiness of other financial institutions; they do not know how much in mortgage-backed securities those institutions hold or the value of those securities.

The Treasury, therefore, needs to address both this counterparty risk perception and the market collapse. It is proposing that government money be used to purchase, at a deep discount, mortgage-backed securities held by financial institutions, which would stabilize market prices and reduce counterparty risk.

'This should work," says Schwarcz, "but it will be much more expensive than if the government had stabilized the market at an earlier point."

-----
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page