New Survey Shows Significant Local Government Jobs Losses

/PRNewswire/ -- New survey research announced today shows that local governments are now facing a fiscal crisis that will force job losses approaching 500,000 and significant cuts in much needed public services. Representatives from the National League of Cities (NLC), United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) and the National Association of Counties (NACo) jointly released the survey results at a press conference on Capitol Hill earlier today and were joined by several members of Congress offering their support to cities and counties during these difficult economic times.

Local governments are a lifeline for their communities providing essential services to their residents. Unfortunately, according to the survey of local governments, these services are being cut and will continue to be cut over the course of the next 18 months as local governments attempt to balance their budgets in response to the on-going economic crisis. Most of the cuts are coming from public safety, public works, public health, and social services.

"For local governments, unemployment and foreclosures resulting from the Great Recession translate into too few revenues making it increasingly difficult to fund or satisfactorily maintain many basic services--not only parks, libraries, and public works projects but also public safety, police and fire services," said Ron Loveridge, NLC President, Mayor of Riverside, California.

Loveridge continued, "Cities are not only the engines of their local communities, they are also the backbone of their regional economies, where investments in infrastructure and services provide a platform for private sector investment and growth. And cities are the wealth of nations. We are where economic recovery must take place... we are where jobs are increased, or more commonly lately, are lost. We must change that equation."

Local governments continue to make the difficult choices in balancing budgets and finding news to operate. "As families all across our country have tightened their budgets, so have our nation's counties. Services to the public have been cut, county employees have been laid off or furloughed and capital expenditures have been reduced," said Judge B. Glen Whitley, NACo President, Tarrant County, TX.

But the report demonstrates that all of the cost cutting will come at a price to our nation's recovery and families. The report makes clear that federal action is critical to helping city leaders stabilize local economies and serve families. Continued Whitley, "The Local Jobs for America Act will help ensure that our county employees who fight crime, protect our communities from fire and natural and man-made disasters, and teach our children, are able to continue performing these vital functions. For this reason as a Republican and President of the National Association of Counties I support passage of H.R. 4812/S.3500."

The three organizations also emphasized there can be no national economic recovery as long as unemployment remains high and the ability of local governments to respond to the needs of their residents is hindered.

U.S. Conference of Mayors Second Vice President, Michael Nutter, mayor of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, concluded, "As a nation, we made a good start with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. But make no mistake about it: the bleeding at the local level is hurting our nation's march toward recovery. And people in America's cities don't understand news reports that refer to a rebounding economy when companies still are not hiring.

"The nation's mayors support the Local Jobs for America Act because it will help people access jobs. These are the same people who own homes, pay taxes and send children to school in our communities. What message does it send to hard-working people if we helped Wall Street, but we can't help create jobs for Main Street?"

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

Sensible Tax Change Would Bring in $450 Million, Avoid Additional Service Cuts

The General Assembly is poised to slash the budget more in light of another month of declining revenues caused by the Great Recession and Georgia's structural deficit.

"This problem is too large to solve with budget cuts alone," said Sarah Beth Gehl, deputy director of the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute. "We should seek a balance of cuts and new revenues through sensible tax changes such as repealing the deduction of state income tax."

One concrete way to bring in $450 million* is to repeal the bizarre state tax deduction, which almost all states do not allow. The deduction not only costs nearly a half-billion dollars, but it unfairly lowers the effective tax rate for taxpayers who itemize.

"This tax change would not affect the vast majority of taxpayers with incomes less than about $50,000, since they do not itemize," said Gehl, "but for those who do, about 15 percent of filers, the average tax increase would be $85. (The total amount will still be deductible on the federal income tax.)

"Another $1 billion cut to state services will have an immediate negative impact on Georgia's economy, as
well as devastating effects on the education and healthcare infrastructure," said Executive Director, Alan Essig. "This sensible tax change should be part of a balanced solution going forward, along with the proposed increase in the cigarette tax."

* $450 million is an estimate calculated by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, March 2010.

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

One in Seven Seniors Faces Social Security Check Cuts in 2010

/PRNewswire / -- Close to seven million seniors -- one in every seven -- will receive a smaller Social Security check next year, according to a new analysis by The Senior Citizens League (TSCL). Millions of other seniors who do not have their Medicare premiums automatically deducted from their checks will also have fewer Social Security dollars leftover next year.

These seniors will be affected because their Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) is forecast to be zero next year, while their Medicare Part B (doctors' visits, tests, and outpatient hospital care), Part C (Medicare Advantage) and/or Part D (prescription drugs) premiums are forecast to rise.

Affected seniors generally fall into one of two groups, if not both:

1. MEDICARE PART B: HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION: Approximately three million
seniors will endure cuts because they are not protected by a "hold
harmless" provision that prevents the vast majority of beneficiaries
from receiving smaller Social Security checks in years when Medicare
Part B premiums exceed the COLA. Two groups of seniors will not receive
hold harmless protection in 2010:
a. MEANS TESTING: 2,121,500 beneficiaries who pay higher premiums due
to Part B "means testing." Individuals with adjusted gross incomes
(AGI) above $85,000 and couples over $170,000 are affected.
b. NEW ENROLLEES: 848,000 new enrollees will pay the 2010 premium
rate, forecast by Medicare's Trustees to be $104.20 per month,
instead of the current rate of $96.40 per month that tens of
millions of seniors will continue to pay next year due to hold
harmless.

2. MEDICARE PARTS C & D: More than 3.8 million other seniors will see
smaller Social Security checks next year due solely to likely increases
in Medicare Parts C and D, for which no hold harmless provision exists.
Note: Millions of other seniors will also be affected, as our estimate
includes just those who will have automatic reductions to their Social
Security checks. Additional millions of seniors who pay plans directly
will also have fewer Social Security dollars leftover next year.


"It's bad enough that seniors will have to endure rising costs next year without an increase in their Social Security checks -- but to actually cut checks for millions of seniors in this economy borders on cruelty," said Daniel O'Connell, TSCL chairman. "Our members are already unable to afford their prescriptions, rent, and air conditioning. We simply can't survive year-after-year of cuts."

A majority of those aged 65 and over who receive a Social Security check depend on it for at least 50 percent of their total income, and one in three beneficiaries rely on it for 90 percent or more of their total income.

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
www.artsacrossgeorgia.com
Arts Across Georgia