Is Your Spouse a Secret Spender?

/24-7/ -- The success of a marriage may not be directly affected by a couple's financial situation, but according to recent polling, it is a factor. According to PayPal, which holds an annual survey in Australia, Canada, Italy, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States, nearly a third of all the couples surveyed (and 43 percent of all American couples), state that the recent worldwide recession has led to an increase in arguments.

Of all couples surveyed in the United States and Mexico, 14 percent admit to ending a relationship because of money, and in the United States, nearly a quarter of all couples (23 percent) have hidden purchases from their partner. It is a combination of these factors, made even more stressful by the increased financial instability since the PayPal survey last year, that may cause couples to look for signs that partners are being less than truthful about spending. Geoff Williams, the co-author of "Living Well With Bad Credit", writing at WalletPop, outlined 10 signs your spouse may be hiding spending from you.

- Unexplained items around the house. Do new items suddenly appear around the home with no explanation? It could be that your spouse made a purchase, but is hoping you don't notice, or, if you do, that you accept the flimsy explanation about their origin.
- Spouse is secretive about money. A spouse who demands to keep finances separate, even as little as a joint checking account, could be a sign that your spouse's finances are not in as good condition as they should be.
- Spouse receives a "dock" in pay. If your spouse comes home from work claiming to have received a dock in pay, but you've never seen the paycheck that shows it, the possibility exists that there was no dock in pay, and your spouse is simply keeping the "lost" money.
- Spouse is eager to get the mail. Has your spouse suddenly become extra interested when the mailman delivers the mail? It could be because an extra credit card bill is in there, extra purchases are being shipped to your address, or that your credit card bill contains extra charges you aren't supposed to see.
- Spouse applies for credit card in your name. One sign you and your spouse need immediate financial help is when your spouse applies for a new credit card in your name. Definitely a red flag that someone's finances are completely out of order.
- Receiving collection calls from unknown creditors. Calls from collection agencies aren't uncommon, but what happens when you answer a call regarding a credit card or debt you know nothing about? Time to see what purchases have been made without your knowing.
- Spouse starts paying less on monthly credit card bills. A spouse who suddenly starts paying the minimum could mean your finances aren't as healthy as you thought. Sometimes this is because the extra money is going to new purchases, or to pay off purchases you know nothing about.
- Grocery bill grows unexpectedly. With today's supermarkets becoming more like shopping malls, the grocery bill that unexpectedly balloons could be from non-essential impulse purchases made in the checkout line.
- Spouse is "extra" nice. Always the stereotypical response to having done something "bad." In some cases your spouse put a ding in the car, but other times you might be being buttered up to break bad news about extra debt.
- Spouse handles all the bills. Couples should really share in everything, and so when your spouse offers or demands to take care of the bills without your help, it could be a sign that the bills are out of control, and the spouse doesn't want you to know.

Of course, any of these signs could have nothing to do with poor finances or secret spending. But add up too many of them, too close together, and there could be a problem. So, while money troubles might not be the prime factor in divorces, distrust certainly is, and so everything ties together. Extra spending, secrets and distrust are a bad mix, so cutting off this pattern of behavior before it gets too common is the key to keeping your marriage intact and your finances in good shape.

Article provided by Jeffrey W. Goldblatt Law Office
Visit us at www.jgoldblattlawfirm.com

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

Georgia Power Announces Planned Redemption of Series O 5.90% Senior Notes and Series R 6% Senior Notes

PRNewswire -- Georgia Power today announced the planned redemption June 24, 2010 of all $150 million aggregate principal amount of its Series O 5.90% Senior Notes due April 15, 2033 and all $200 million aggregate principal amount of its Series R 6% Senior Notes due October 15, 2033.

The redemption price for the full redemption of the Series O 5.90% Senior Notes due April 15, 2033 (NYSE:GPD) and the Series R 6% Senior Notes due October 15, 2033 (NYSE:GPJ) will be 100% of the principal amount thereof ($25 per senior note), plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.

As trustee, The Bank of New York Mellon is expected to notify each registered holder by first class mail on or about May 25, 2010. The Bank of New York Mellon is located at 101 Barclay Street, 1st Floor East, New York, New York 10286.

Georgia Power is the largest subsidiary of Southern Company, one of the nation's largest generators of electricity. The company is an investor-owned, tax-paying utility with rates well below the national average. Georgia Power serves 2.3 million customers in all but four of Georgia's 159 counties.

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

US Real Estate Markets Moving Toward Recovery

/PRNewswire/ -- The US economy is recovering and it is beginning to show in job growth. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported an increase of 290,000 jobs for April. The largest share, 27.5% was in professional and business services with 80,000 new jobs. The federal government followed with 66,000 new temporary workers to assist with the decennial census. Health care also grew, adding 20,000 workers and increasing its year-to-date total to 244,000. For the year, employment has expanded by 573,000 with 483,000 or 84% added to the private sector.

Meanwhile, unemployment increased from 9.7% to 9.9%, which oddly is a "good" sign. The increase is the result of people re-entering the employment market; meaning the economy is starting to recover in earnest. Thus far, the data is reflecting the traditional pattern of a slowly recovering economy.

Looking at past recessions the 1980s appears to be the most similar. It was capital constrained much like we are today. In the 1990s we were over-built and had the S & L crisis to resolve. The cry was "stay alive to '95." In early 2000 we had the dot com crisis and accounting scandals. Looking at the recession of the early 1980s as a guide, it may be 3 years or more before life begins to feel like "normal." The recession of the 1980s lasted 16 months running from July 1981 to November 1982. As a result of that downturn, unemployment peaked in November of 1982 at 10.8%. From that point it took 38 months for the economy to fully recover and for unemployment to fall below 7.0%. It was another 10 months before the economy was consistently below 7.0%. So, full recovery this cycle is likely 3 years away with an optimal selling period 3 to 4 years away at the earliest. Current signals suggest now is an optimal buying period.

Thus far, the current economy is consistent with expected patterns and our forecasts. Other data is also suggesting recovery. This is further illustrated in the most recently available quarterly data extracted from the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF). Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, decreases in total returns began to steadily abate, and as of the most recent quarter turned slightly positive. This offers another strong signal that the market has reached bottom and is beginning to turn upward. This is also a strong signal that we are entering an optimal buying period.

With the use of our research Blumberg Capital Partners, our parent organization recognized this cyclical pattern early, and sold its assets between 2006 and 2008, near the cycle peak and closed its prior Fund. Now the trend is reflecting a market nearing bottom and moving toward recovery. In response, Philip Blumberg CEO of Blumberg Capital Partners is launching a new fund, the Blumberg Strategic Asset Fund and is again looking to acquire assets.
 -----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

Ameris Bancorp Announces Acquisition of Satilla Community Bank

PRNewswire -- AMERIS BANCORP (Nasdaq-GS: ABCB), announced May 14 that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ameris Bank, has entered into a definitive agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to assume the deposits and acquire certain assets of Satilla Community Bank, a full-service, single-office bank located in St. Marys, Georgia. The Georgia Department of Banking and Finance declared Satilla Community Bank closed May 14 and appointed the FDIC as receiver. As a result of this acquisition, Ameris Bank will assume approximately $134.0 million in total deposits and acquire approximately $142.3 million in total assets.

As a branch of Ameris Bank, the St. Marys office of Satilla will be open and serving customers on Monday, May 17, 2010, during the bank's normal business hours. Satilla depositors will automatically become depositors of Ameris Bank, and deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC. With this acquisition, Ameris Bank will now operate 54 locations in Georgia, Florida, Alabama and South Carolina.

Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., President & CEO of Ameris, commented, "We are excited to welcome the Satilla Community Bank customers and employees to the Ameris Bank family. Customers can be confident that their deposits are safe and readily accessible. Ameris Bank has supported the financial needs of local communities since 1971. Our St. Marys and Kingsland locations have been an important part of our four-state footprint since late 2005. We look forward to continuing that tradition through this FDIC-assisted transaction."

Ameris Bancorp is headquartered in Moultrie, Georgia. For additional information about Ameris Bank, please visit our web site at www.amerisbank.com.

Ameris Bancorp Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "ABCB". The preceding release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "anticipate" and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates which they were made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

134 National and State Associations Endorse Swipe Fee Reform Amendment

/PRNewswire/ -- In a letter addressed to all members of the U.S. Senate, 134 trade associations endorsed an amendment (S. Amdt. 3932) to the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 sponsored by Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-IL) that will address excessive debit card swipe fees and the anti-competitive practices of credit card companies and the big banks that issue their cards.

The common-sense amendment would free merchants of anti-competitive restrictions imposed by the credit card companies, allowing merchants to offer discounts when customers use less expensive forms of payment. The amendment would also direct the Federal Reserve to issue regulations to ensure that swipe fees imposed on debit card transactions are 'reasonable and proportional' to the cost incurred in processing the transaction.

More than 80 percent of all interchange fees are collected by the 10 largest banks. The amendment offered by Sen. Durbin exempts all banks, credit unions and thrifts with assets less than $1 billion, meaning that 92% of all banks, 98% of all credit unions, and 86% of all thrifts would be exempt, allowing them to continue to receive the same interchange fees they receive today.

According to the letter signed by 57 national associations and 77 state trade associations,

"Despite Congress' efforts to reign in abusive practices, credit card companies continue to take advantage of a major loophole in financial regulation. In fact, they announced interchange rate increases just months after the passage of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (Credit CARD Act), effectively circumventing many of the reforms instituted by Congress. More recently, Visa Europe announced last month that it was voluntarily dropping debit card interchange fees to 0.2% in Europe, a decrease of 60%, while earlier in the month Visa increased rates on similar transactions in the United States by some 30%. Quite literally, at a rate of approximately 2.0% on debit card interchange fees, which is 10 times higher in the United States, American businesses are subsidizing European transactions.

"Simple, common-sense reforms are needed to correct this market imbalance, which would give our organizations' members additional tools to manage our costs related to interchange fees. First, the amendment would give the Federal Reserve the authority to conduct an open and fair rulemaking - without prescribing an outcome - in order to develop regulations to ensure that interchange fees imposed on debit card transactions be 'reasonable and proportional' to the cost incurred in processing the transaction. Debit transactions are not an extension of credit and are directly drawn from a consumer's checking account, yet the interchange rate on debit transactions continues to increase. Small banks, credit unions and thrifts with assets of under $1 billion would be carved-out from these rules, meaning that 92% of all banks, 98% of all credit unions, and 86% of all thrifts would be exempt, allowing them to continue to receive the same interchange fees they receive today.

"Second, the amendment would prohibit anti-competitive restrictions on discounts and the setting of minimum transaction levels, providing entities with the freedom to choose their preferred method of payment. Under current rules, any business, charity or government agency that accepts credit or debit cards is prohibited from setting a minimum transaction level, such as $3, even though the entity may actually lose money on the transaction because of slim profit margins. Visa and MasterCard can and do impose fines on small businesses up to $5,000 per day for such offenses, which has the effect of ensuring that the card companies and big banks turn a profit even if the small business loses money on the transaction. In addition, the amendment allows businesses to incentivize the use of one card network over another (e.g., a discount may be provided for Discover cards if they carry a lower interchange rate) and allows businesses to offer discounts on certain forms of payment (e.g., a discount may be offered for cash, check, PIN debit, etc., all of which carry lower rates than credit cards). This amendment would not enable merchants to discriminate against debit cards issued by small banks and credit unions. Visa and MasterCard require merchants to accept all cards within their networks, and this amendment does not change that requirement."

In the last year, small business owners have gathered nearly four million petition signatures from their customers and delivered them to Members of Congress, calling on them to reform these unfair fees.

In addition to the Retail Industry Leaders Association, organizations signing the letter included American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, American Dental Association, International Franchise Association, National Grocers Association, National Restaurant Association, Arkansas Hospitality Association, Louisiana Restaurant Association, Retail Council of New York State, and the Wyoming Lodging and Restaurant Association.

RILA is the trade association of the world's largest and most innovative retail companies. RILA members include more than 200 retailers, product manufacturers, and service suppliers, which together account for more than $1.5 trillion in annual sales, millions of American jobs and more than 100,000 stores, manufacturing facilities and distribution centers domestically and abroad.

Full letter text and list of organizations below:

May 12, 2010

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE:


The undersigned organizations, representing a diverse array of interests including small business, state organizations, dentists, retailers, restaurants, grocery stores, convenience stores and others, write in strong support of S. Amdt. 3932, sponsored by Senator Richard Durbin, regarding interchange fee reforms to S. 3217, the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 now before the Senate. Unless relief is granted, interchange "swipe fees," which amounted to $48 billion in 2008, will continue to rise as card companies and issuing banks seek even higher profits, primarily on the backs of our organizations' members. This comes at a time when businesses, state agencies and charities - all of whom pay interchange fees - are struggling to help the economy grow again and when consumers can least afford pricing increases.

Despite Congress' efforts to reign in abusive practices, credit card companies continue to take advantage of a major loophole in financial regulation. In fact, they announced interchange rate increases just months after the passage of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (Credit CARD Act), effectively circumventing many of the reforms instituted by Congress. More recently, Visa Europe announced last month that it was voluntarily dropping debit card interchange fees to 0.2% in Europe, a decrease of 60%, while earlier in the month Visa increased rates on similar transactions in the United States by some 30%. Quite literally, at a rate of approximately 2.0% on debit card interchange fees, which is 10 times higher in the United States, American businesses are subsidizing European transactions.

Simple, common-sense reforms are needed to correct this market imbalance, which would give our organizations' members additional tools to manage our costs related to interchange fees. First, the amendment would give the Federal Reserve the authority to conduct an open and fair rulemaking - without prescribing an outcome - in order to develop regulations to ensure that interchange fees imposed on debit card transactions be "reasonable and proportional" to the cost incurred in processing the transaction. Debit transactions are not an extension of credit and are directly drawn from a consumer's checking account, yet the interchange rate on debit transactions continues to increase. Small banks, credit unions and thrifts with assets of under $1 billion would be carved-out from these rules, meaning that 92% of all banks, 98% of all credit unions, and 86% of all thrifts would be exempt, allowing them to continue to receive the same interchange fees they receive today.

Second, the amendment would prohibit anti-competitive restrictions on discounts and the setting of minimum transaction levels, providing entities with the freedom to choose their preferred method of payment. Under current rules, any business, charity or government agency that accepts credit or debit cards is prohibited from setting a minimum transaction level, such as $3, even though the entity may actually lose money on the transaction because of slim profit margins. Visa and MasterCard can and do impose fines on small businesses up to $5,000 per day for such offenses, which has the effect of ensuring that the card companies and big banks turn a profit even if the small business loses money on the transaction. In addition, the amendment allows businesses to incentivize the use of one card network over another (e.g., a discount may be provided for Discover cards if they carry a lower interchange rate) and allows businesses to offer discounts on certain forms of payment (e.g., a discount may be offered for cash, check, PIN debit, etc., all of which carry lower rates than credit cards). This amendment would not enable merchants to discriminate against debit cards issued by small banks and credit unions. Visa and MasterCard require merchants to accept all cards within their networks, and this amendment does not change that requirement.

By providing these and other important reforms, the Congress will send a strong message that it supports modernizing and updating our financial payments systems while providing relief to businesses owners who have seen their interchange credit card assessments skyrocket - for many businesses exceeding the cost of providing health care benefits to their employees.

In closing, we are very concerned about the unintended consequences of not addressing interchange fees will have on our industries as the card companies and big banks continue to seek higher profits as a direct result of financial regulatory reform legislation, and other failing portfolios, through ever increasing interchange fees. We ask that you support S. Amdt. 3932, sponsored by Senator Durbin, to the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 when it comes up for a vote in order to ensure that financial regulation reform is comprehensive and complete. We look forward to working with you and your staff to incorporate these meaningful, common-sense reforms as part of the financial regulatory reform legislation.

Sincerely,




National Trade Associations
---------------------------

American Apparel & Footwear Association
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
American Beverage Licensees
American Booksellers Association
American Dental Association
American Home Furnishings Alliance
American Hotel & Lodging Association
American Nursery & Landscape Association
American Veterinary Medical Association
Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association
Consumer Electronics Association
Consumer Electronics Retailers Coalition
Digital Media Association
Drycleaning & Laundry Institute
Entertainment Merchants Association
Food Marketing Institute
Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America
International Association of Airport Duty Free Stores
International Association of Amusement Parks & Attractions
International Council of Shopping Centers
International Festivals & Events Association
International Franchise Association
Jewelers of America
National Association of Chain Drugstores
National Association of College Stores
National Association of Convenience Stores
National Association of Recording Merchandisers
National Association of Shell Marketers
National Association of Theatre Owners
National Associations of Concessionaires
National Council of Chain Restaurants
National Franchisee Association
National Golf Course Owners Association
National Grocers Association
National Home Furnishings Association
National Parking Association
National Restaurant Association
National Retail Federation
National Ski Areas Association
National Small Business Association
NATSO, Representing America's Travel Plazas and Truck Stops
Outdoor Amusement Business Association, Inc.
Outdoor Industry Association
Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council
Petroleum Marketers Association of America
Petroleum Retailers & Auto Repair Association
Retail Industry Leaders Association
Service Station Dealers of America and Allied Trades
Small Business Majority
Society of American Florists
Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America
Specialty Equipment Market Association
Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Association
Tire Industry Association
Travel Goods Association
United States Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel
World Floor Covering Association





State Trade Associations
------------------------

Alaska Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant & Retailers Association
Arizona Petroleum Marketers Association
Arizona Restaurant and Hospitality Association
Arkansas Hospitality Association
Arkansas Oil Marketers Association
California Independent Oil Marketers Association
California Retailers Association
Colorado/Wyoming Petroleum Marketers Association
Delaware Restaurant Association
Empire State Petroleum Association
Florida Petroleum Marketers Association
Florida Restaurant & Lodging Association
Fuel Merchants Association of New Jersey
Georgia Oilmen's Association
Georgia Restaurant Association
Hawaii Restaurant Association
Idaho Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association
Illinois Petroleum Marketers Association /Illinois Association of
Convenience Stores
Independent Connecticut Petroleum Association
Indiana Hotel & Lodging Association
Indiana Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, Inc.
Indiana Restaurant Association
Kentucky Petroleum Marketers Association
Kentucky Restaurant Association
Louisiana Oil Marketers & Convenience Store Association
Louisiana Restaurant Association
Maine Energy Marketers Association
Michigan Petroleum Association
Michigan Restaurant Association
Mid-Atlantic Petroleum Distributors Association
Minnesota Petroleum Marketers Association
Mississippi Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Stores
Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association
Montana Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association
Montana Restaurant Association
Nebraska Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association
Nebraska Restaurant Association
Nevada Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association
New Jersey Restaurant Association
New Jersey Retail Merchants Association
New Mexico Petroleum Marketers Association
New Mexico Restaurant Association
New York State Restaurant Association
North Carolina Petroleum & Convenience Marketers
North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association
Ohio Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association
Ohio Restaurant Association
Oklahoma Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association
Oregon Petroleum Association
Pennsylvania Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association
Pennsylvania Retailers' Association
Petroleum & Convenience Marketers of Alabama
Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association Kansas
Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Stores of Iowa
Restaurant Association Metropolitan Washington
Restaurant Association of Maryland
Retail Council of New York State
Rhode Island Hospitality Association
South Carolina Petroleum Marketers Association
South Carolina Hospitality Association
South Dakota Petroleum & Propane Marketers Association
South Dakota Retailers Association
Tennessee Fuel & Convenience Store Association
Tennessee Hospitality Association
Texas Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association
Texas Restaurant Association
Utah Petroleum Marketers & Retailers Association
Vermont Fuel Dealers Association
Virginia Petroleum, Convenience and Grocery Association
Washington Oil Marketers Association/Pacific Northwest Oil Heat Council
Washington Restaurant Association
West Virginia Hospitality & Travel Association
West Virginia Oil Marketers and Grocers Association
Western Petroleum Marketers Association
Wisconsin Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association
Wisconsin Restaurant Association
Wyoming Lodging and Restaurant Association


-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage

New Study Released on the Non-Government Response to the U.S. Economic Crisis

/PRNewswire/ -- A new study shows America's foundations were swift, flexible and targeted in their response to the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression - using on-the-ground knowhow to make a significant impact. The study from The Philanthropic Collaborative (TPC) is the first of its kind to analyze the private-sector response to the crisis and shows that the federal government's response was not the only story.

"The ability of foundations to be swift and flexible in their response allowed them to modify their giving throughout the crisis and ensure the grants went to those most in need," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, author of the study. "During the U.S. economic collapse, we saw grant-making shift, expand and follow the larger unemployment and housing needs that developed and became acute in communities across the country. Even when foundations themselves faced financial stress from the very same crisis, our analysis shows a very clear shift in grant-making patterns to meet emerging economic needs."

The study analyzed a sample of 2,672 grants that totaled $472 million of foundation giving from 2008 to 2009, and early planned giving for 2010. In the area of preventing mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, private and community foundations saturated their grant-making in states with higher than average delinquency rates. In 2009, for example, 95% of sampled grant-making, or $296 million, went to high-delinquency states. As unemployment became a larger economic problem between 2008 and 2010, the analysis shows foundations devoted more activity to states suffering higher unemployment.

"In the City of Detroit, we have found working with the foundation community has been beneficial for our community and our residents. The foundations allow the city to stretch current budget dollars to plan for the future while continuing to provide services to the residents," said Detroit Mayor Dave Bing. "The study by The Philanthropic Collaborative is representational of the impact foundations have on the City of Detroit," he added.

"Foundation grant-making is fundamental in helping to improve the lives of families during time of economic crisis," said Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. "Private and community resources, when quickly targeted to local community needs, can play a major role in collective efforts to get local economies back on track. We have seen foundation giving in the Mile High City leverage positive social change with meaningful, measurable results."

"Some in our communities have been devastated by the economic crisis, which has taken a toll on municipal and state resources" said Providence Mayor David Cicilline. "While the responses from the federal and state governments are critically important, we cannot lose sight of the targeted and timely response from community foundations. Without their work, many more individuals and families would fall through the cracks in our system. Foundations are effective because they are part of our community, know the people, can bring aid to where it's needed most and act with speed and precision. They also embody another important attribute - they are able to provide assistance without the red tape and bureaucracy. This entrepreneurial approach is what makes them so effective and welcome in our efforts to ensure people have the means to weather this economic storm."

"I've said many times that government cannot do it all by itself. It must be a citizen movement," Toledo Mayor Michael Bell. "Organizations like to the Toledo Community Foundation and the Stranahan Foundation help provide aid during times of economic distress for people who may otherwise slip through the cracks. We have to be involved as a community and philanthropy plays a vital role in our ability to provide for our citizens."

"This study illustrates the critical role foundations are able to play in assisting Americans and communities in crisis," said John Tyler, Chairman of TPC. "As impressive and encouraging as this is, though, it is only part of the story because previous TPC research has told us that each dollar of grant support from these foundations can generate on average more than eight times that amount of value in direct, economic benefits," he added.

The study analyzed a sample of grants for the years 2008 to 2009, and early planned giving for 2010, obtained from the Foundation Center, which maintains the most comprehensive database of foundations' grant-making activities. The data provides information on the amount, activity and target audience of each grant. Grants averaged $176,608 but ranged from $500 to $5 million.

-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter:  @GAFrontPage