Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Southern Company Reports Second Quarter Earnings

PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Southern Company today reported second quarter earnings of $416.4 million, or 54 cents a share, compared with $429.2 million for the second quarter of 2007, or 57 cents a share, in the same period a year ago.

For the six months ended June 30, Southern Company's earnings were $775.6 million, or $1.01 a share, compared with $767.8 million, or $1.02 a share, for the same period a year ago.

Earnings for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008, included a $67 million charge, or 9 cents per share, related to three leveraged leases from the 1990s when Southern Company pursued development of international energy projects. Earnings for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007, included synthetic fuel earnings of 2 cents per share and 5 cents per share, respectively.

Excluding the impact of synthetic fuel investments and charges related to the leveraged leases, Southern Company earned 63 cents a share for the second quarter of 2008, compared with 55 cents a share for the same period in 2007, and earnings for the first six months of 2008 were $1.10 a share, compared with 97 cents a share for the same period in 2007.

Revenues for the second quarter were $4.22 billion, compared with $3.77 billion in the same period a year ago, an 11.8 percent increase. For the first six months of the year, revenues totaled $7.90 billion, compared with $7.18 billion in the same period a year ago, a 10 percent increase.

"Through hard work and dedication, our employees continue to safely provide reliable electricity to our customers at prices below the national average and with industry leading customer service," said Southern Company Chairman, President and CEO David M. Ratcliffe. "By maintaining this focus on the execution of our business strategy, we continue to produce solid results for our shareholders."

As compared with the nation, the economic slowdown is less severe in the Southeast, as evidenced in part by a job growth rate of 0.45 percent in the Southeast versus 0.04 percent for the nation. Although customer growth has slowed, Southern Company has added 40,000 customers since the end of the second quarter in 2007, a 0.9 percent increase.

Positive earnings drivers for the second quarter include recovery of investments made for transmission and distribution infrastructure and environmental control technology. These investments are needed to help ensure that Southern Company continues to meet growing demand, maintain reliability and produce cleaner energy. Contributions from customers on our market- response rates also helped drive earnings.

The positive earnings drivers were offset in part by the charge for leveraged leases, asset depreciation primarily associated with increased investment in environmental equipment and infrastructure, and higher non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses.

In the second quarter, kilowatt-hour sales to retail customers in Southern Company's four-state service area decreased 1.2 percent compared with sales in the second quarter of 2007. Residential electricity sales decreased 2.7 percent. Electricity sales to commercial customers increased 0.9 percent, and industrial sales decreased 1.8 percent. Year-to-date, kilowatt-hour sales to retail customers increased 0.1 percent compared with sales during the same period in 2007. Residential electricity sales decreased 0.4 percent. Commercial sales increased 1.3 percent and industrial sales declined 0.7 percent.

Total energy sales to Southern Company's customers in the Southeast, including wholesale sales, increased 0.5 percent in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the same period of 2007. Year-to-date, total sales of electricity increased 0.9 percent compared with the same period in 2007.

With nearly 4.4 million customers and more than 42,000 megawatts of generating capacity, Atlanta-based Southern Company (NYSE:SO) is the premier energy company serving the Southeast, one of America's fastest-growing regions. A leading U.S. producer of electricity, Southern Company owns electric utilities in four states and a growing competitive generation company, as well as fiber optics and wireless communications. Southern Company brands are known for excellent customer service, high reliability and retail electric prices that are significantly below the national average. Southern Company has been listed the top ranking U.S. electric service provider in customer satisfaction for nine consecutive years by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Visit our Web site at www.southerncompany.com.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

Certain information contained in this release is forward-looking information based on current expectations and plans that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking information includes, among other things, statements concerning results of operations and customer and economic growth. Southern Company cautions that there are certain factors that can cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information that has been provided. The reader is cautioned not to put undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is not a guarantee of future performance and is subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Southern Company; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such suggested results will be realized. The following factors, in addition to those discussed in Southern Company's Annual Report on Form 10- K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and subsequent securities filings, could cause results to differ materially from management expectations as suggested by such forward-looking information: the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory change, including legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the electric utility industry, implementation of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, environmental laws including regulation of water quality and emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, carbon, soot, or particulate matter and other substances, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations; current and future litigation, regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries, including the pending EPA civil actions against certain Southern Company subsidiaries, FERC matters, IRS audits, and Mirant matters; the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Company's subsidiaries operate; variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), and the effects of energy conservation measures; available sources and costs of fuels; effects of inflation; ability to control costs; investment performance of Southern Company's employee benefit plans; advances in technology; state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to fuel and storm restoration cost recovery; regulatory approvals related to the potential Plant Vogtle expansion, including Georgia PSC and NRC approvals; the performance of projects undertaken by the non-utility businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities; internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued; potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries; the ability of counterparties of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to make payments as and when due and to perform as required; the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with neighboring utilities; the direct or indirect effect on Southern Company's business resulting from terrorist incidents and the threat of terrorist incidents; interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts, including Southern Company's and its subsidiaries' credit ratings; the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to obtain additional generating capacity at competitive prices; catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, hurricanes, droughts, pandemic health events such as an avian influenza, or other similar occurrences; the direct or indirect effects on Southern Company's business resulting from incidents similar to the August 2003 power outage in the Northeast; and the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard setting bodies. Southern Company and its subsidiaries expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking information.

Georgia-Carolina Bancshares Announces Second Quarter Results

PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. (BULLETIN BOARD: GECR) , parent company of First Bank of Georgia, reported today net income of $866,000 ($.25 per diluted common share) for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $935,000 ($.27 per diluted common share) for the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $1,618,000 ($.46 per diluted common share) compared to $1,666,000 ($.48 per diluted common share) for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Remer Y. Brinson III, President & CEO of the Company stated, "We are pleased with our results given the current state of the economy and interest rates. Due to the rapid decrease in interest rates by the Federal Reserve, our net interest margin has declined. This is the primary reason for the decrease in year over year quarterly income."

"Consumer and commercial loan growth has been strong during the first half of 2008, while residential mortgage and construction lending has slowed. We have also enjoyed a 14.7% growth in non-interest bearing deposits and a 17.50% growth in NOW accounts," Brinson continued.

"We feel that this growth is in response to our community bank model and our ATM Anywhere FREE Checking program which provides an automatic refund of other banks' ATM charges," Brinson said.

Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company with $456 million in assets as of June 30, 2008. The Company owns First Bank of Georgia, which conducts banking operations through offices in Augusta, Columbia County, and Thomson, Georgia.

Georgia-Carolina Bancshares' common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol GECR.

This press release may contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "anticipates," "plans" or similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, and are made on the basis of management's plans and current analyses of the Company, its business and the industry as a whole. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, economic and market conditions, competition, interest rate sensitivity and exposure to regulatory and legislative changes, and other risks and uncertainties described in the Company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results contemplated in the forward-looking statements will be realized. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be construed as a representation by the Company or any person that the future events, plans, or expectations contemplated by the Company will be achieved. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Monday, July 28, 2008

United States and Cities Fare Well in a KPMG Report on Business Tax Costs

PRNewswire/ -- San Juan, Puerto Rico, Baltimore and Atlanta have the most favorable tax structures for businesses among U.S. cities/locations with populations exceeding 2 million, according to a study released today by KPMG International (KPMG).

Of the 35 large international cities highlighted in the study, San Juan, Baltimore and Atlanta all rank in the top ten -- first, eighth and ninth, respectively. And among the 10 countries in the study, the U.S. ranked fifth in terms of the favorability of its overall tax structure for business.

KPMG's 2008 Competitive Alternatives: Focus on Tax study is a global comparison of the total tax burden that may be faced by companies in 102 cities throughout 10 countries including corporate income taxes, capital taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, miscellaneous local business taxes and statutory labor costs. The study is intended to provide a guide for companies wanting to compare the tax burden they may incur in different cities around the world.

"Cities across the United States recognize that attracting and retaining businesses of all sizes is important for a vibrant local economy," said Hartley Powell, national leader of the Strategic Relocation and Expansion Services practice at KPMG LLP, the U.S. member firm of KPMG International. "As the survey results indicate, certain cities are leaders in developing a tax environment that encourages business development, and tax costs are a key consideration in the site selection process."

According to the study, San Juan had a total tax index of 46.6 representing tax costs 53.4 percent below the U.S. national average of 100.0. San Juan was followed by Baltimore and Atlanta at 92.1 and 95.1, respectively.

Other high-ranking large U.S. cities included Tampa, Fla. (98.1), Detroit (98.6), and Phoenix (98.8).

Industry Classifications

The results of the study also vary depending on the type of business. As a location for R&D operations, the three cities with the most cost-effective tax structure in the large-sized city category were San Juan (61.8), Baltimore (88.4), and Portland, Ore. (88.5).

For manufacturing operations, where property taxes and taxes on equipment and capital are of interest, the three, large-sized U.S. cities with the most cost effective tax structure were San Juan (42.4), Baltimore (91.3), and Atlanta (95.3).

The services industry, on the other hand, tends to be most affected by statutory labor costs. The top three, large-sized U.S. cities with the most favorable tax structure for services included San Juan (65.5), Atlanta (92.7) and Baltimore (94.2).

Mid-sized Cities

In the mid-sized city category (populations between 500,000 and 2 million), the top cities included Omaha, Neb. (94.2), Greenville-Spartanburg, S.C. (95.2), Little Rock, Ark. (95.7), Milwaukee, Wis. (96.0), Youngstown, Ohio (97.1), Raleigh, N.C. (98.1), McAllen, Texas (98.5), Buffalo, N.Y. (98.9), and Salt Lake City, Utah (99.1).

Small-Sized Cities

In the small-sized city category (populations between 100,000 and 500,000), the top cities included Saginaw, Mich. (92.0), Cheyenne, Wyo. (92.1), Cedar Rapids, Iowa (92.1), Sioux Falls, S.D. (92.8), Shreveport, La. (92.9), Lexington, Ky. (93.0), and Montgomery, Ala. (95.2).

The full text of the 2008 study by KPMG International is available online at www.CompetitiveAlternatives.com.

The total tax index is a measure of the total taxes paid by corporations in a particular location and industry, expressed as a percentage of total taxes paid by similar corporations in the United States. Thus the United States has a total tax index of 100.0, which represents the benchmark against which the other countries and cities are scored.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

GMAC Insurance Reduces Rates in Georgia

PRNewswire/ -- GMAC Insurance today announced it is reducing its auto insurance rates in Georgia, effective immediately. Many drivers in the Peach State can expect to save an average of around seven percent when purchasing GMAC Insurance coverage from one of more than 400 Georgia-based independent agencies.

With fuel prices surging, these rate decreases will help customers manage their transportation costs. What's more, Georgia customers can potentially achieve even greater savings through discounts for paying a policy in full at the time of purchase rather than through monthly installments, in addition to GMAC Insurance's exclusive GM Retiree and GM Dealership employee discounts.

"We are committed to providing new and existing customers with outstanding service at affordable prices," said Scott Murphy, vice president of product and pricing, GMAC Insurance. "In addition to the new lower prices, we'll continue to offer the same benefits, such as our outstanding SmartServices, including SmartValet, SmartInspect and the SmartParts Promise, and our 24/7 claim reporting service and emergency expense allowance."

The GMAC Insurance rate reduction is a statewide average that will affect individual customers differently. Overall premium changes for individual motorists will vary depending on factors such as the coverages they carry, the discounts for which they qualify, where they live, the kind of vehicle insured, who drives it and how much it is driven.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Mohawk Industries, Inc. Announces Second Quarter Earnings

PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE:MHK) today announced 2008 second quarter net earnings of $89 million and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.29 (both 23% below last year). In the second quarter of 2007, net earnings and EPS were $115 million and $1.68 per share, respectively. Net sales for the quarter were $1,840 million, a decrease of 7% from 2007. The company generated cash flow from operations of $267 million. In addition, $183 million of debt was paid down improving the company's debt to capital ratio to 30%.

For the first six months of 2008, net earnings were $154 million and EPS was $2.25 (both 25% below last year). Net earnings and EPS were $206 million and $3.01 per share, respectively, in the first six months of 2007. Net sales for the first six months of 2008 were $3,578 million representing a 7% decrease from 2007. The sales decreases for both the quarter and the year to date are attributable to slowing U.S. residential housing and European demand.

In commenting on the second quarter results, Jeffery S. Lorberbaum, Chairman and CEO stated, "Our results for the second quarter were impacted by the slowing economies in the U.S. and Europe and rapidly increasing commodity costs. Declining new U.S. home construction and residential remodeling, slowing European demand and rising raw material and energy costs have contributed to the flooring industry cyclical decline. The rapidly increasing costs are impacting our margins even as we raise selling prices to offset these costs.

Our management team remains focused on improving our market position, increasing quality, introducing innovative products and providing excellent customer service. The team is relentlessly pursuing cost control, working capital management, and process improvement to manage the cycle. We believe these efforts will better position our company for growth when the market improves.

The Mohawk segment performance is under pressure with sales declining 13% below last year. The commercial and rug products are performing better while the hard surface and the cushion products are declining more than residential carpet. Higher energy, raw material and freight costs are causing dramatic cost inflation. We have announced three carpet price increases since December to offset rising costs. We are increasing our commercial carpet tile offering with new value, performance and stylized options in our brands. We have re- engineered processes and improved manufacturing productivity, quality and yields.

Dal-Tile sales are down 5% during the quarter and are doing well in a very difficult environment. Commercial and Mexican sales growth continue to buffer the impact of the declining U.S. residential industry. In July, we purchased a stone center in North Carolina to continue expanding our national presence. The major factors affecting margins are rapidly rising energy and freight costs along with customers trading down. In the second quarter we have increased product prices and energy surcharges to offset rising costs and more may be required in the future. Many cost initiatives are being executed to improve labor productivity, control expenses and reduce energy consumption. Freight costs are being reduced by utilizing lower cost transportation modes, increasing weight per load and making more direct shipments.

Unilin sales were up 13% over last year and down 7% on a constant exchange rate basis excluding the Columbia acquisition. Sales declines were experienced in the U.S. and much of Western Europe, with Russia and Eastern Europe growing. Sales in the U.K. and Spain were most impacted by the slowing European industry. Oil based material and energy inflation continues to increase the cost of most products. A 5% - 6% price increase has been announced for the U.S. laminate business during the third quarter. The new laminate production in the U.S. will be operating in the third quarter and will reduce our costs on higher end products presently imported from Europe. We have many cost initiatives to reduce energy consumption, modify processes and lower material cost.

The wood operations continue to operate at a loss. New products are being launched in the third quarter to reposition both the Columbia and Mohawk brands in the market. We have made significant improvements in manufacturing processes, reducing labor, improving quality and material yields, but negative overhead absorption is offsetting the progress. We expect our new product strategy will improve our wood sales and product mix."

The third quarter outlook is challenging given the environment. Slow demand with higher material and energy costs will continue to compress our margins. As a result, we are raising product prices and transportation fees on most products. We will adapt our strategy to the changing environment. Based on these factors our guidance for the third quarter of 2008 is $1.06 to $1.15. We have many focused initiatives under way to reduce cost, minimize working capital, improve service and bring new products to market. We remain convinced Mohawk will be a stronger company as we come out of this cycle.

Certain of the statements in the immediately preceding paragraphs, particularly anticipating future performance, business prospects, growth and operating strategies and similar matters and those that include the words "could," "should," "believes," "anticipates," "expects," and "estimates," or similar expressions constitute "forward-looking statements." For those statements, Mohawk claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements will be accurate because they are based on many assumptions, which involve risks and uncertainties. The following important factors could cause future results to differ: changes in economic or industry conditions; competition; raw material and energy costs; timing and level of capital expenditures; integration of acquisitions; rationalization of operations; litigation and other risks identified in Mohawk's SEC reports and public announcements.

Mohawk is a leading supplier of flooring for both residential and commercial applications. Mohawk offers a complete selection of carpet, ceramic tile, laminate, wood, stone, vinyl, and rugs. These products are marketed under the premier brands in the industry, which include Mohawk, Karastan, Ralph Lauren, Lees, Bigelow, Dal-Tile, American Olean, Unilin and Quick Step. Mohawk's unique merchandising and marketing assist our customers in creating the consumers' dream. Mohawk provides a premium level of service with its own trucking fleet and over 250 local distribution locations.

There will be a conference call Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 11:00 AM Eastern Time.

The telephone number to call is 1-800-603-9255 for US/Canada and 1-706-634-2294 for International/Local. Conference ID # 54459485. A conference call replay will also be available until Monday, July 28, 2008 by dialing 1-800-642-1687 for US/local calls and 1-706-645-9291 for International/Local calls and entering Conference ID # 54459485.

  MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of
Earnings Data Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands, June 28, June 30, June 28, June 30,
except per share data) 2008 2007 2008 2007

Net sales $1,840,045 1,977,210 3,578,142 3,841,073
Cost of sales 1,357,153 1,420,512 2,635,411 2,760,935
Gross profit 482,892 556,698 942,731 1,080,138
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 336,829 358,450 672,350 711,313
Operating income 146,063 198,248 270,381 368,825
Interest expense 32,742 39,138 66,509 80,717
Other (income) expense, net 1,650 (2,783) 4,429 1,476
U.S. Customs refund - - - (9,154)
Earnings before income
taxes 111,671 161,893 199,443 295,786
Income taxes 22,893 46,625 45,275 90,140
Net earnings $88,778 115,268 154,168 205,646
Basic earnings per share $1.30 1.69 2.25 3.02
Weighted-average shares
outstanding 68,403 68,167 68,389 68,037
Diluted earnings per share $1.29 1.68 2.25 3.01
Weighted-average common and
dilutive potential common
shares outstanding 68,617 68,533 68,598 68,394

Other Financial Information
(Amounts in thousands)
Net cash provided by
operating activities $266,871 225,685 186,692 314,452
Depreciation & amortization $75,052 75,382 148,308 149,228
Capital expenditures $49,839 35,428 105,810 60,384

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
(Amounts in thousands)
June 28, June 30,
2008 2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash & cash equivalents $64,038 57,763
Receivables 982,378 998,023
Inventories 1,250,300 1,229,326
Prepaid expenses 131,218 121,625
Deferred income taxes 138,332 173,252
Total current assets 2,566,266 2,579,989
Property, plant and equipment, net 2,018,813 1,858,282
Goodwill 2,876,724 2,719,724
Intangible assets 1,190,157 1,153,761
Deferred income taxes and other assets 307,572 27,972
$8,959,532 8,339,728
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt $290,392 364,114
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 965,743 1,061,157
Total current liabilities 1,256,135 1,425,271
Long-term debt, less current portion 1,896,642 2,137,349
Deferred income taxes and other long-term
liabilities 763,858 768,278
Total liabilities 3,916,635 4,330,898
Total stockholders' equity 5,042,897 4,008,830
$8,959,532 8,339,728

Segment Information As of or for the Three As of or for the Six
Months Ended Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands) June 28, June 30, June 28, June 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007

Net sales:
Mohawk $968,426 1,113,412 1,873,470 2,161,073
Dal-Tile 481,511 505,187 930,562 972,148
Unilin 411,525 363,531 815,280 715,627
Corporate and eliminations (21,417) (4,920) (41,170) (7,775)
Consolidated net
sales $1,840,045 1,977,210 3,578,142 3,841,073

Operating income:
Mohawk $34,593 59,730 56,834 108,175
Dal-Tile 58,169 69,353 115,110 133,748
Unilin 60,121 81,737 110,077 142,236
Corporate and eliminations (6,820) (12,572) (11,640) (15,334)
Consolidated
operating income $146,063 198,248 270,381 368,825

Assets:
Mohawk $2,400,869 2,474,276
Dal-Tile 2,259,255 2,297,745
Unilin 4,109,314 3,337,870
Corporate and eliminations 190,094 229,837
Consolidated assets $8,959,532 8,339,728



Reconciliation of Debt to Capital

As of
(Amounts in thousands) June 28, 2008
Outstanding Debt (a) $2,187,034
Total stockholders' equity 5,042,897
Total capital (b) $7,229,931

Debt to capital percentage (a)/(b) 30%


Reconciliation of
Operating Income to
EBITDA
Trailing Four
Three Months Ended Quarters Ended
(Amounts in September December March 29, June 28, June 28,
thousands) 29, 2007 31, 2007 2008 2008 2008

EBITDA reconciliation:
Operating income 200,814 180,467 124,318 146,063 651,662
Other (expense)/
income 799 3 (2,779) (1,650) (3,627)
Depreciation and
amortization 75,636 81,573 73,256 75,052 305,517
Reconciliation
of debt to
EBITDA 277,249 262,043 194,795 219,465 (c) 953,552


Reconciliation of Debt to EBITDA

Debt to EBITDA (a)/(c) 2.3


Reconciliation of Unilin Segment Net
Sales to Adjusted Unilin Segment
Net Sales

Three Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands) June 28, 2008
Unilin segment net sales $411,525
Less: Exchange rate gain 41,000
Adjusted Unilin segment net sales 370,525
Less: Wood acquisition net sales 33,863
Adjusted Unilin segment net sales $336,662


The Company believes it is useful for itself and investors to review, as applicable, both GAAP and the above non-GAAP measures in order to assess the performance of the Company's business for planning and forecasting in subsequent periods.

Southern Company Announces Quarterly Dividend

PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Southern Company today announced a regular quarterly dividend of 42 cents per share on the company's common stock, payable Sept. 6, 2008, to shareholders of record Aug. 4, 2008.

This marks the 243rd consecutive quarter -- dating back to 1948 -- that Southern Company will have paid a dividend to its shareholders.

With nearly 4.4 million customers and more than 42,000 megawatts of generating capacity, Atlanta-based Southern Company (NYSE:SO) is the premier energy company serving the Southeast, one of America's fastest-growing regions. A leading U.S. producer of electricity, Southern Company owns electric utilities in four states and a growing competitive generation company, as well as fiber optics and wireless communications. Southern Company brands are known for excellent customer service, high reliability and retail electric prices that are significantly below the national average. Southern Company has been listed the top ranking U.S. electric service provider in customer satisfaction for nine consecutive years by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Visit our Web site at www.southerncompany.com .

Triple Crown Media, Inc. Announces Nasdaq Staff Determination Letter

PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- On April 15, 2007, Triple Crown Media, Inc. (NASDAQ:TCMI) (the "Company") received an initial notification from The Nasdaq Stock Market that the Company had not maintained a minimum market value of its shares of common stock in accordance with Marketplace Rule 4450(e)(1) and would be required to regain compliance by July 14, 2008.

On July 16, 2008 the Company received a follow-up notification from The Nasdaq Stock Market that the Company has not regained compliance in accordance with Marketplace Rule 4450(e)(1). Accordingly, its securities will be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market. Trading of the Company's common stock will be suspended at the opening of business on July 25, 2008, and a Form 25-NSE will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will remove the Company's securities from listing and registration on The Nasdaq Stock Market. The Company's securities will continue to be quoted in the pink sheets under the symbol TCMI.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Fidelity Southern Corporation Reports Modest Profit and Increased Reserves

PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Fidelity Southern Corporation ("Fidelity" or "the Company") (NASDAQ:LION) , holding Company for Fidelity Bank, reported net income of $5,000 for the second quarter of 2008 compared to $2,070,000 for the same quarter of 2007. Basic and diluted income per share for the second quarter of 2008 were less than $.01 compared to earnings of $.22 for the same period in 2007. Net income for the first six months of 2008 was $1,115,000 compared to $4,634,000 for the same period in 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the first six months of 2008 were $.12 compared to $.50 for the same period in 2007.

Chairman James B. Miller, Jr. said, "We have the capacity to manage through the cycle. Though we continue to focus on core earnings and building the franchise, these are obviously uncertain and troubled times. Even with extraordinary effort, charge-offs and reserves will increase well into next year."

Significant developments in the quarter and the first half included:

-- Net interest income grew 3.02% over the first quarter of 2007 and 3.6%
over the first half of 2007.
-- Margin was up slightly in the second quarter to 2.95% from 2.94% in the
first quarter of 2008. Cost of funds was down as a result of
conservative deposit pricing as loan pricing firmed.
-- Personnel expenses were down 7% in the second quarter when compared to
the first quarter of 2008.
-- Total assets grew only 2.5% in the quarter to $1.779 billion.
-- Demand deposit accounts increased 14% this year through June.
-- An updated website was introduced during the second quarter to meet
growing demand.
-- Remote deposit volume grew to 33.2% of all deposits.
-- Brokerage activities were moved to Reliance Trust into a managed
account program which will provide both a fixed and variable revenue
stream.
-- Reserves substantially increased to 1.48% of loans from 1.05% at June
30, 2007, and 1.34% at March 31, 2008. The increase was $2.4 million
over the second quarter of 2008 and $7.2 million greater than reserves
at June 30, 2007. Provision for loan losses was $4.8 million and $9.4
million for the second quarter and first six months of 2008,
respectively, compared to $1.7 million and $2.2 million for the same
periods in 2007.
-- Net charge-offs increased to $2.4 million in the second quarter from
$2.1 million in the first quarter of 2008. Indirect automobile lending
accounted for 81.6% of net charge-offs during the second quarter
compared to 75.7% in the first quarter.
-- The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding was .63% for
the first six months of 2008 compared to .33% for the same period in
2007.
-- Nonperforming loans, repossessions and other real estate owned totaled
$57.7 million at the end of the second quarter, an increase of $20.7
million in the quarter.
-- During the quarter $2.5 million of OREO assets were sold but $5.6
million was added to OREO net of $501,000 in charge-downs. OREO
consists of 50 houses, representing 73.4% of total balances, and 79
lots and includes no commercial property.
-- New residential construction loan advances made during the quarter
totaled $15.0 million, while the payoffs of construction loans totaled
$29.6 million. There are 832 houses and 2,024 lots financed at June
30, 2008, compared to 1,172 houses and 2,372 lots at June 30, 2007.
-- Nonperforming residential construction loans at June 30, 2008, included
140 houses totaling $25.7 million and 166 lots totaling $13.8 million.
During the quarter $2.0 million of nonperforming loans were paid off by
our customers while $25.7 million of loans were moved to nonperforming.
-- Dividend was cut to $.01 for the third quarter from $.09 in the
previous quarter.

The decrease in net income for both the second quarter and six month periods compared to the prior year was primarily the result of a higher provision for loan losses due to higher charge-offs and adverse credit trends in the real estate construction and to some extent consumer loan portfolios requiring an increase in the allowance for loan losses.

Net interest income for the second quarter increased 3.0% over the first quarter of 2008 and increased $369,000 or 3.2% over the same period in 2007. Net interest income for the first six months of 2008 increased $825,000 or 3.6% when compared to the same period in 2007. The increases were primarily a result of higher average interest-earning assets. The net interest margin stabilized in the second quarter. It increased slightly to 2.95% in the second quarter compared to 2.94% in the first quarter of 2008. The net interest margin decreased 13 basis points in the second quarter of 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007. The net interest margin decreased 10 basis points to 2.95% for the fist half of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The decline in net interest margin in the second quarter and first six months of 2008 was due primarily to reductions in the prime rate and an increase in nonperforming loans.

Total interest income for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 decreased $2.2 million and $2.1 million, or 7.6% and 3.7%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The decreases in interest income for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 were the result of a decrease of 104 basis points and 74 basis points in the yield on average interest-earning assets, respectively, offset in part by the growth in average interest-earning assets, which increased $120.1 million and $104.3 or 7.8% and 6.8%, respectively.

Interest expense for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 decreased $2.5 million and $2.9 million, or 15.2% and 8.9%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The decreases in interest expense for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 were attributable to an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities of $124.1 million and $113.0 million, respectively, more than offset by a 106 basis point and 77 basis point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

The provision for loan losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 was $4.8 million and $9.4 million, respectively, compared to $1.7 million and $2.2 million for the same periods in 2007, due to increased charge-offs and adverse credit trends in the construction loan portfolio and to some extent in the consumer loan portfolio. Net charge-offs increased $1.1 million and $2.3 million to $2.4 million and $4.5 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 when compared to the same periods in 2007. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans increased from 1.19% at December 31, 2007, to 1.48% at June 30, 2008, compared to 1.05% at June 30, 2007. Nonperforming assets increased to $57.7 million at the end of the second quarter of 2008 compared to $12.4 million at the end of the second quarter of 2007 and $24.2 million at the end of 2007. Management believes it has identified and placed on nonaccrual, charged down, and charged off these nonperforming assets timely and appropriately.

Noninterest income increased $19,000 and $1.2 million or .4% and 14.0% to $4.4 million and $10.0 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2008, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase in noninterest income for the second quarter of 2008 compared to 2007 was a result of higher indirect lending revenues which increased $204,000 or 15.6% to $1.5 million because of an increase in the gain on sales and increases in net servicing and ancillary fees generated by the serviced portfolio. The increase in noninterest income of $1.2 million for the first six months of 2008 was due to the $1.3 million securities gain in the first quarter of 2008 from the mandatory redemption of 29,267 shares of Visa, Inc. common stock as a result of its initial public offering in March 2008. Indirect lending revenues also increased $417,000, or 15.6%, to $3.1 million during the first six months of 2008 when compared to the same period last year due to an increase in the gain on sales of indirect loans and increases in net servicing and ancillary fees from indirect loans serviced.

Noninterest expense for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 increased $720,000 and $569,000, or 6.3% and 2.5%, to $12.1 million and $23.5 million, respectively compared to the same periods in 2007. The increases for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 are a result of higher salaries and benefits expense, which increased $96,000 and $533,000 or 1.5% and 4.2% to $6.4 million and $13.2 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007, primarily due to the addition of seasoned loan production and branch operations staff, including SBA, indirect automobile, and commercial lenders, and staff for the three branches opened in 2007. In addition, OREO write-downs increased to $501,000 in the second quarter of 2008 compared to none for the same period in 2007. The increase in noninterest expense for the first six months of 2008 was partially offset by the reversal of the fourth quarter 2007 Visa litigation expense accrual of $567,000 as the result of the Visa funding of a litigation escrow account through its initial public offering in March 2008.

Fidelity Southern Corporation, through its operating subsidiaries Fidelity Bank and LionMark Insurance Company, provides banking services and a credit related insurance product through 23 branches in Atlanta, Georgia, a branch in Jacksonville, Florida, and an insurance office in Atlanta, Georgia. SBA loans are provided through employees located throughout the Southeast. For additional information about Fidelity's products and services, please visit the website at www.FidelitySouthern.com .

This news release contains forward-looking statements, as defined by Federal Securities Laws, including statements about financial outlook and business environment. These statements are provided to assist in the understanding of future financial performance and such performance involves risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. Any such statements are based on current expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of some factors that may cause such forward-looking statements to differ materially from actual results, please refer to the section entitled "Forward Looking Statements" on page 3 of Fidelity Southern Corporation's 2007 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2008 Housing Counseling Demand Soars 184 Percent at Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Atlanta

PRNewswire/ -- More than 30,000 Americans turned to Consumer Credit Counseling Service (CCCS) of Greater Atlanta for housing counseling in the first half of 2008, nearly equaling the agency's total number of housing clients for all of 2007.

The increase in families seeking the nonprofit agency's help tracks the deepening of a national mortgage crisis that initially affected mostly low-income borrowers, but is now spreading to people with higher household incomes. For the first time in the 44-year history of CCCS of Greater Atlanta, the average household income of clients seeking housing counseling exceeded $40,000.

In addition to a 184 percent jump in new housing counseling sessions in the first six months of 2008 compared to last year, the agency helped many more people overall in each area of service:

-- Total counseling sessions conducted in person, by phone and over the Internet, increased from 120,000 in the first half of 2007 to 170,641 in the same period this year, an increase of more than 41 percent.

-- Bankruptcy counseling sessions increased from 79,417 in the first half of 2007 to 100,789 in the same period this year, an increase of 26.9 percent.

-- Budget and debt counseling sessions increased from 29,544 in the first half of 2007 to 38,837 in the same period this year, an increase of 31.5 percent.

"Demand for our counseling services is rising significantly as people try to avoid foreclosure and bankruptcy, as well as cope with rising gasoline and food costs," said Suzanne Boas, president of CCCS of Greater Atlanta. "Our agency will add at least 80 new housing counselors in the second half of this year to continue to help people avoid foreclosure and meet other financial needs."

The hiring of 80 new housing counselors and plans to open a new metro Atlanta counseling center are the result of a $2 million grant made in June by the Ford Foundation. The grant will support the agency's expansion of a pilot test of a new software platform that lets credit counselors eliminate lengthy delays faced by homeowners in urgent need of modified mortgages.

Approximately three-fourths of housing counseling sessions during the first half of 2008 involved individuals seeking help to avoid foreclosure of their home. The Atlanta-based agency is one of the nation's leading nonprofit counseling agencies helping people seek solutions to foreclosure. It provides counseling to homeowners in all 50 states 24 hours a day, seven days a week, through a 24-hour hotline, 1-888-995-HOPE.

The rise in people seeking CCCS of Greater Atlanta bankruptcy counseling follows an increase in the country's bankruptcy rate. Federal bankruptcy law requires individuals to complete credit counseling before they can file for bankruptcy. Approximately 20 percent of all of Americans who file for bankruptcy seek counseling help from CCCS of Greater Atlanta.

Budget and debt counseling primarily serves individuals struggling with credit card, medical and other unsecured debt. These people often seek help to pay their creditors. The agency tries to work out debt management plans for people who cannot make their minimum payments.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Omni Financial Services Elects to Delist Voluntarily from Nasdaq Stock Market

BUSINESS WIRE --Omni Financial Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFSI) (the Company), the bank holding company for Omni National Bank (the Bank), today announced that on July 13, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors voted to delist the Companys common stock from the Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq) on a voluntary basis. The Board determined that costs of maintaining the listing outweighed the benefits, given the relatively low public float and level of trading activity for the common stock and the expenses associated with continued listing, including listing fees and compliance costs relating to the issues identified below. The Company anticipates that Nasdaq will suspend trading in the common stock within 10 days after the date of this press release. The delisting will become final and effective 10 days after the Company files a Form 25 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which the Company anticipates filing on or about July 25, 2008. The Company has not yet determined whether the common stock will continue to trade via the pink sheets after the delisting.

The Company has previously reported its receipt of notices from Nasdaq indicating that the Company is not in compliance with the following Nasdaq Global Market listing requirements: (i) Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14), which requires timely filing of periodic reports with the SEC; (ii) Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(2), which requires a minimum market value of publicly held shares (MVPHS) of $5,000,000; and (iii) Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(5), which requires a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share. The Company has been given until July 15, 2008 to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the 10-K) and until August 15, 2008 to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, but is continuing to address the previously announced valuation issues relating to these reports and will be unable to file the 10-K within the time frame stated above. The compliance deadlines for the MVPHS and bid price requirements were October 8, 2008 and December 29, 2008.

Ameris Bancorp Reports Net Income of $3.1 Million for Second Quarter of 2008

PRNewswire-FirstCall -- AMERIS BANCORP (NASDAQ:ABCB) , reported net income of $3.1 million, or $0.23 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to net income for the same quarter in 2007 of $5.4 million, or $0.39 per share. Net income for the year-to-date period totaled $6.1 million, or $0.45 per share, compared to $10.4 million, or $0.76 per share for the same period in 2007. Continued weakness in general economic conditions in several of the Company's markets led to higher levels of loan provisions and negatively impacted the results for both the quarter and year-to-date period. Commenting on the quarter's results, Edwin W. Hortman, Jr. said, "Given the current operating environment, I am encouraged by our Company's performance. During the most recent quarter, we dealt quickly and aggressively with credit quality issues and recorded provisions at levels that should not persist. We continue to experience dilution from the investment in our De Novo strategy and expect profitability to improve significantly as we move forward. Lastly, despite four quarters in this difficult environment, Ameris Bank has protected its capital base and remains well capitalized with approximately $30 million of excess capital."

The Company's provision for loan losses during the second quarter amounted to $3.7 million, an increase of $2.8 million over the $936,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2007. Similarly, provision for loan losses for the year-to-date period increased $5.5 million to $6.9
million for the first six months of 2008 compared to 2007. The high levels of provision for loan losses reflect the Company's efforts to quickly address problem credits and are the result of very weak real estate conditions in a few of the Company's markets. As in previous quarters, the majority of the deterioration in credit quality is concentrated in a small number of larger credits. The Company continues to benefit from a loan portfolio that is well diversified over four states and various loan categories.

Non-performing assets increased slightly during the current quarter to 2.08% of total loans, compared to 2.00% for the first quarter of 2008, and 1.57% at December 31, 2007. Net charge-offs on loans during the second quarter of 2008 were similar to levels experienced during the first quarter of 2008 at 0.75% of total loans. The Company's reserve for loan losses at June 30, 2008 was flat compared to December 31, 2007, at 1.71% of total loans.

Trends in Net Interest Margin

In spite of drastically lower short-term rates and intense competition for core deposits, the Company's net interest margin declined only slightly during the second quarter of 2008 to 3.98%, compared to 4.03% in the same quarter in 2007. For the six-month period ending June 30, 2008, the Company's net interest margin was 3.95%, compared to 4.08% in the same period in 2007.

Loan yields during the quarter decreased to 6.97%, compared to 8.46% in the same quarter in 2007. In the most recent quarter, loan yields decreased from the 7.56% reported in the first quarter of 2008. This decline in the most recent quarter was partially attributed to accelerated renegotiation of interest rates in the Company's fixed rate loan portfolio as customers have opportunities to significantly reduce expenses or accelerate repayment of principal.

The Company's cost of funds during the current quarter was 2.72%, compared to 3.84% in the same quarter in 2007, and 3.30% in the first quarter of 2008. During the quarter, deposit costs declined to 2.78% from 3.68% in the same quarter in 2007 and from 3.25% in the first quarter of 2008. The decline against the linked quarter resulted from continued repricing of all deposit accounts but the majority of the savings resulted from material savings on time deposit maturities. Non-deposit borrowing costs also declined in the second quarter of 2008 to 2.10% from 5.81% in the second quarter of 2007 due to the Company's restructure of these borrowings and the use of interest rate floors on several of the advances. Efforts continue to reduce interest expense and are focused primarily on time deposit maturities and improving the Company's overall funding mix.

Operating Income and Operating Expense Trends

For the year-to-date period ending June 30, 2008, net interest income increased 1.6% to $37.5 million, when compared to net interest income for the year-to-date period ending June 30, 2007. Non-interest income increased 17.4% to $5.3 million during the second quarter of 2008, when compared to the same quarter in 2007. Continued growth in service charges and mortgage fees led to the increase in non-interest income. Service charges on deposit accounts increased 19.3% to $3.7 million in the current quarter, when compared to the second quarter of 2007. Income from mortgage loan activities also increased primarily as a result of hiring and training efforts during the last half of 2007. Mortgage income rose to $855,000, an increase of 6.9% over the second quarter of 2007. The Company's mortgage lending activities do not subject the Company to appreciably higher levels of risk, as all loans are closed with guaranteed takeouts and are underwritten by the purchaser.

Operating expense increased during the quarter by 16.6% to $16.0 million, when compared to the same quarter in 2007. Year to date, operating expenses increased to $31.6 million, an increase of 11.9% when compared to the same period in 2007. As stated in past quarters, increases in salaries and benefits as well as in occupancy and equipment are largely the result of the Company's expansion efforts. While meaningful accretion to profitability levels and earnings per share are not expected for the next several quarters, the Company does not foresee additional dilution to current profitability and earnings levels.

Ameris Bancorp is headquartered in Moultrie, Georgia, and at the end of the most recent quarter, had 48 locations in Georgia, Alabama, northern Florida and South Carolina.
Ameris Bancorp Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "ABCB".

The preceding release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "anticipate" and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates which they were made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

With the S&P 500 Having Gone Nowhere in 9 Years, CornerCap's Chief Investment Officer Offers Comments to Answer the 'What Next' Question

PRNewswire -- Some remember the 1970s when the stock market index was flat for an entire decade. Due to the OPEC oil cartel driving energy prices way up while inflation was simultaneously ratcheting up, the market went sideways.

"Now, thirty years later, we appear to have circled back for a repeat of that disappointing decade," says Thomas E. Quinn, the chief executive officer and chief investment officer of Atlanta-based CornerCap Investment Counsel, in a recently published commentary.

"Over the nine years between 1999 and 2008, a period many have referred to as the 'Lost Decade,' the S&P 500 stock index was down 6.75 percent or -0.8 percent annually and, like the 1970s, energy costs are once again skyrocketing, crowding out consumer purchases and contributing to fears of inflation," Quinn notes.

Noting that CornerCap's equity returns during this period were well over the averages of the Lost Decade, Quinn says a disciplined investment process that recognizes the booms and busts of the short-term market swings is the key to avoiding long-term pain.

"There is no magic," Quinn says. "Beating the averages over time requires a consistent philosophy and strict adherence to a buy / sell discipline which keep the probabilities in your favor."

The full text of Quinn's commentary is available online and may be downloaded at no cost from http://www.cornercap.com/library/Articles/07_15_08a.shtml .

According to Quinn, fear appears to be rampant now, with many investors selling their stock holdings. But probabilistically, Quinn says, broad selling now makes absolutely no sense.

"We can realistically observe the behavior of other investors," Quinn says. "We can objectively quantify when their behavior overpower the facts. In the long cycles, we can take advantage of those infrequent, but really extreme, investor obsessions. In the short cycles, we can continually rebalance our portfolios," he says.

"Simply stated, if we pay attention to probabilities rather than the pundits, we may lose a few small hands but we should ultimately win the game," Quinn says.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Survey Finds 29% of Americans Receiving Nonprofit Financial Counseling Use Federal Tax Stimulus to Pay for Food, Gasoline

PRNewswire -- A survey of 3,004 persons across the United States who receive financial counseling from a national nonprofit agency found that 29.4% used funds from their tax stimulus check to pay for everyday expenses, such as food and gasoline, while 20% said they paid down their credit card debt.

In addition, almost 5% of those surveyed said they utilized the funds to help them prevent foreclosure of their home or avoid bankruptcy. An additional 7.5% said the funds "give some more time to organize their finances and possibly avoid" these two scenarios.

In response to the question, "If you are facing foreclosure, will this check help you avoid foreclosure?" 3.5% responded "yes." An additional 5.1% of those surveyed, said the stimulus payment "gives some more time to organize finances and possibly avoid foreclosure."

Approximately 1.4% surveyed, said the funds would help them avoid bankruptcy, while 2.4% said the funds will allow them more time to organize their finances and possibly avoid bankruptcy.

The survey was conducted in late June by Consumer Credit Counseling Service (CCCS) of Greater Atlanta, a national nonprofit agency that provides credit counseling, as well as counseling to prevent foreclosure and avoid bankruptcy, to people in all 50 states. Of the 3,004 responding to the survey, 2,147 had received their check from the federal government.

"Many Americans are using the federal stimulus checks to help them get by and pay for everyday expenses," said Suzanne Boas, president of CCCS of Greater Atlanta. "The extra money is providing them breathing room with their creditors, including those who want to avoid foreclosure and keep their homes."

Approximately $106.7 billion in stimulus payments will be made this year to 130 million households. The payments began on April 28 and are scheduled to be completed by mid-July.

Rather than spend funds on new purchases, the survey also shows that some Americans are using the stimulus checks to make additional payments on their mortgage, car or other loans, and others are using the funds for home repairs. For example:

-- 7.8% said they would use the funds to make an additional payment on their mortgage;

-- 9% said they would make an additional payment on another debt, such as a car payment or a student loan;

-- Approximately 5.6% of respondents said the funds will be used to make home repairs;

-- 2.5% said they would use the funds to pre-pay their property or income taxes for 2008.

Other survey findings include:

-- Approximately 82% of the people surveyed said they plan to save 20% or less of the tax stimulus funds they receive.

Asked to rate the state of their current financial situation on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the "most stressful," about 33.6% of respondents rated their situation a "1."

When asked, "What is your confidence level in the economy six months from now," 66% expect it to worsen and only 11% expect it to improve. The remaining people surveyed expect the economy to remain the same.

Statement from Governor Sonny Perdue Concerning President Bush’s Lifting of Executive Order on Offshore Drilling

Governor Sonny Perdue issued the following statement today concerning President Bush’s Lifting of Executive Order on offshore drilling:

“With record gas prices straining the budgets of many Georgia families, we cannot afford to take any option off the table. It is imperative that we take a balanced approach of conserving, developing alternative energy technologies and increasing the supply of domestically-produced resources. I want to thank President Bush for his action today and I urge Congress to hear the voices of the American people who are asking for relief from our dependence on foreign oil.”

Monday, July 14, 2008

GeorgiaBankRobbery.com Website Announced to Aid in Apprehending Suspects

Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Gregory Jones, FBI Atlanta, in conjunction with the Georgia Association of Bank Security (GABS), is pleased to announce the following new aid to crime fighting in Georgia:

A new publicly accessed web site, GeorgiaBankRobbery.com, is designed to assist law enforcement in the identification and apprehension of suspects throughout Georgia. This web site features images of persons who may be involved in criminal activity and wanted for questioning. Through this web site, the public is urged to click on the image to send comments or contact law enforcement (a direct link with contact information for Atlanta Crime Stoppers is provided) should they recognize any of these individuals or know their whereabouts.

GeorgiaBankRobbery.com is sponsored by the member banks of the Georgia Association of Bank Security (GABS).

The Georgia Association of Bank Security (GABS) was formed in 1980 by Bank Security Directors from the Major Atlanta Financial Institutions, after discussions with each other found that they each had similar criminal activity that was affecting each others companies. They decided that one of the best ways they could help solve their own crimes was to help each other as a united group. They started sharing information about Bank Robbery Suspects and other financial crimes with not only each other but also the FBI, and Local & State Law Enforcement. They found out that not only was this group successful in solving crimes together, they could also be a unified force in making changes in security training, and driving new development for security equipment.


Saturday, July 12, 2008

Omni Financial Services Receives Nasdaq Notice of Non-Compliance

BUSINESS WIRE--Omni Financial Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFSI) (the Company), the bank holding company for Omni National Bank, today announced that on July 10, 2008, the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market (the Staff) notifying the Company that it fails to comply with Nasdaqs minimum market value of publicly held shares (the MVPHS) requirement for continued listing set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(2) (the Rule), which requires companies to maintain a MVPHS of $5,000,000.

In accordance with Marketplace Rule 4450(e)(1), the Company will be provided 90 calendar days, or until October 8, 2008, to regain compliance. If, at anytime before October 8, 2008, the MVPHS of the Companys common stock is $5,000,000 or greater for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days, the Staff will provide written notification to the Company that it has achieved compliance with the Rule. If the Company does not regain compliance with the Rule by October 8, 2008, the companys common stock is subject to delisting. At that time, the Company may appeal the Staffs determination to delist its securities to a Listing Qualifications Panel.

Forbes Ranks Georgia as Third Best State for Alternative Energy from Biomass

Forbes Magazine has tapped Georgia as the third best state in the nation for alternative energy from biomass. Also this week, cable news and business channel CNBC ranked Georgia in the top ten and second in the Southeast in its annual rankings of “America’s Top States for Business.”

According to a recent Forbes article entitled “America's Best Places For Alternative Energy,” the abundance of biomass in Georgia’s Bioenergy Corridor ranks third in the nation as a potential source of renewable energy. The article referenced the amount of privately owned forest in Georgia, more than any other state in the country, as a reason for the state’s ranking. Forbes also cited that “roughly 50 million tons of the state's own timber end up in the state's wood-products manufacturing plants every year” and the industry “returns nearly half of it in the form of primary mill wood debris.” Only Iowa and North Dakota ranked higher. Rounding out the top five were Mississippi and North Carolina.

“Georgia’s wealth of natural resources combined with our research institutions and a strong business climate create an ideal environment for the development of renewable energy,” said Governor Perdue. “We appreciate Forbes’ recognition of our ability to develop alternative energy sources.”

Georgia’s Energy Innovation Center (EIC), housed at the Georgia Environmental Facilities Authority (GEFA), draws on the state's vast resources to expand and strengthen Georgia's bioenergy industry. The EIC recruits and promotes industries focused on producing energy from clean and renewable sources. Georgia boasts an abundance of renewable natural resources such as pine trees and agricultural products, along with waste streams from agriculture and industrial processes, available as feedstocks for an expanding renewable energy industry. Companies concentrating on every aspect of energy development will find a streamlined and pro-active business environment in Georgia.

Georgia is at the forefront of the nation’s development of cellulosic ethanol, a non-food feedstock for the production of ethanol from pine and other wood residuals. Range Fuels broke ground on the nation’s first commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plant in Soperton on November 6, 2007. The facility is expected to be operational in 2009. In addition, the state’s research institutions including the Georgia Institute of Technology, University of Georgia and the Herty Advanced Materials Development Center are providing R&D in support of cellulosic ethanol and other renewable energy alternatives.

The Bioenergy Corridor represents an extensive network of bioenergy-related businesses and organizations located throughout the state: Atlanta and Rome to the north; Columbus to the west; Albany, Valdosta and Brunswick to the south; and Athens, Augusta and Savannah to the east. The Bioenergy Corridor’s northern region encompasses research and development, academic, and public and private partnerships. Manufacturing facilities are primarily situated in the mid-to-south region, where a majority of commercial pine forests and current commercial forestry infrastructure are located.

This week, the financial network CNBC ranked Georgia in the top 10 in “America’s Top States for Business.” Coming in at number 8, the Peach State received high marks for its strong workforce, excellent transportation network and affordable cost of living. Georgia received the second highest ranking in the Southeast, behind only North Carolina, which came in at number 6.

Each year, CNBC compiles rankings for all 50 states in 10 categories such as workforce, transportation, cost of doing business and others. The combined scores in those 10 categories are then used to generate an overall ranking.

“Georgia’s high ranking in America’s Top States for Business shows that CNBC appreciates our state’s selling points,” said Ken Stewart, commissioner of the Georgia Department of Economic Development. “We market Georgia every day by showcasing our well-trained workforce, unmatched transportation network and a cost of living that is welcoming to families.”

The state’s access to capital, business friendliness, cost of doing business, technology and innovation and overall economy also placed Georgia above average. According to its Web site, CNBC used publicly available data to score all 50 states on 40 different measures of competitiveness, which are separated into ten broad categories. For more information, visit the Web site at http://www.cnbc.com/id/25447603.

Sens. Chambliss-Isakson Urge USDA to Stop Plans to Change Peanut Program Loans

U.S. Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), Ranking Republican Member on the Senate Agriculture Committee, and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) today sent a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture Under Secretary Dr. Mark Keenum urging the Department to continue using the current peanut loan differential method for 2008 and 2009. The proposal made by USDA last month would result in a significantly lower marketing loan rate for the Runner variety, which makes up almost 100 percent of Georgia production. Georgia produces nearly 45 percent of all the peanuts produced in the United States, making it the number one peanut producing state.

Text of the letter is below:

July 10, 2008

Dr. Mark Keenum
Under Secretary
Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services
Room 205 Whitten Building
United States Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20250

Dear Dr. Keenum:

Now that the 2008 farm bill has finally been enacted into law the responsibility of implementing the legislation consistent with Congressional intent falls on the Department of Agriculture. This task can be as daunting as crafting the legislation and we are appreciative of the efforts you have taken to expedite the implementation process.

However, we are concerned about proposed changes to the peanut program. Shortly after the passage of the farm bill, a white paper was distributed at the direction of Deputy Under Secretary Floyd Gaibler highlighting proposed changes to the method of determining marketing loan differentials for peanuts. The proposal to move to a market-based loan differential for peanuts was met with little to no support within the peanut industry. We find it very disturbing that since Congress made minimal changes to the Peanut Title of the 2008 farm bill that USDA would make such a drastic proposal, which was never discussed during the many farm bill meetings attended by the Department.

Recently you held an industry wide meeting to discuss the peanut market-based loan differential proposal. You made it clear to the industry that the proposal would not be implemented for the 2008 crop of peanuts, but that a decision for the 2009 and subsequent crop years has not yet been made. We are appreciative of the fact there will be no changes for the 2008 crop and that you assured the industry there would be an open dialogue on the subject before a final decision is made for the 2009 and subsequent crop years.

After the industry wide meeting, we both received a letter from the American Peanut Council (APC). The APC is the trade association representing all segments of the U.S. peanut industry. The letter stated that APC members, at your request, reviewed the proposal again and still determined that if enacted the proposal, “…will harm the peanut industry and subject the federal government to the risk of increased financial losses.”

Dr. Keenum, we respectfully request that the peanut market-based loan differential proposal not be considered and that the Department continue to use the existing peanut loan differential method. The proposal is not supported by any segment of the industry and we are fearful that if the Department continues to pursue this proposal there will be a significant deterioration of USDA’s relationship with the peanut industry.

Please do not hesitate to contact us or our staff if you have any questions about our request.

Very truly yours,

Saxby Chambliss
Johnny Isakson